Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18570645›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2008

Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the PHQ-9.

Manote Lotrakul, Sutida Sumrithe, Ratana Saipanish

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05070949 (Self-compassion to Reduce Diabetes Distress in Persons With Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 215 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
215citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05070949 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Self-compassion to Reduce Diabetes Distress in Persons With Type 1 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled34ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArmsMindful Self-Compassion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

215 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 424 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2012
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

155 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manote LotrakulDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand. ramlt@mahidol.ac.th
Sutida Sumrithe
Ratana Saipanish
Ramathibodi Hospital · THMahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost depression screening tools in Thailand are lengthy. The long process makes them impractical for routine use in primary care. This study aims to examine the reliability and validity of a Thai version Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a screening tool for major depression in primary care patients.

methodsThe English language PHQ-9 was translated into Thai. The process involved back-translation, cross-cultural adaptation, field testing of the pre-final version, as well as final adjustments. The PHQ-9 was then administered among 1,000 patients in family practice clinic. Of these 1,000 patients, 300 were further assessed by the Thai version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and the Thai version of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). These tools served as gold-standards for diagnosing depression and for assessing symptom severity, respectively. In the assessment, reliability and validity analyses, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed.

resultsComplete data were obtained from 924 participants and 279 interviewed respondents. The mean age of the participants was 45.0 years (SD = 14.3) and 73.7% of them were females. The mean PHQ-9 score was 4.93 (SD = 3.75). The Thai version of the PHQ-9 had satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79) and showed moderate convergent validity with the HAM-D (r = 0.56; P < 0.001). The categorical algorithm of the PHQ-9 had low sensitivity (0.53) but very high specificity (0.98) and positive likelihood ratio (27.37). Used as a continuous measure, the optimal cut-off score of PHQ-9 >/= 9 revealed a sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.77, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.21, negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.99, and positive likelihood ratio of 3.71. The area under the curve (AUC) in this study was 0.89 (SD = 0.05, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.92).

conclusionThe Thai version of the PHQ-9 has acceptable psychometric properties for screening for major depression in general practice with a recommended cut-off score of nine or greater.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonLanguageAdultAlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPersonality InventoryPrimary Health CarePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID18570645
PMCPMC2443128
OpenAlexW2010298035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.