ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2008
Staging mammography nonadherent women: a qualitative study.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.Psycho-oncology · 2017Pooled it
- Design and methods for a randomized clinical trial comparing three outreach efforts to improve screening mammography adherence.BMC health services research · 2011Trial
- Decision-making about cervical screening in a heterogeneous sample of nonparticipants: A qualitative interview study.Psycho-oncology · 2018Article
- Beliefs Underlying Messages of Anti-Cancer-Screening Websites in Japan: A Qualitative AnalysisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018Article
- Engagement and communication among participants in the ClinSeq Genomic Sequencing Study.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017Article
- Moving mammogram-reluctant women to screening: a pilot study.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2009Article
- Why don't people adopt recommended health behaviors?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFew studies have related stages of mammography screening nonadherence with the rationale used by overdue women.
methodsWe used a grounded theory approach to obtain and analyze data from focus groups, telephone interviews, and surveys. Emergent specific themes were compared with emerging decision levels of nonadherence. Each decision level was then compared with the Precaution Adoption Process Model and the Transtheoretical Model.
resultsA total of 6 key themes influencing mammogram nonadherence emerged as did 6 decision levels. Variability within themes was associated with specific decision levels. The decision levels were not adequately classified by either stage model.
conclusionsStage-based educational strategies may benefit by tailoring interventions to these 6 decision levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18569247What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.