Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18566886›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of health care finance and economics2008

Early discharge and home intervention reduces unit costs after total hip replacement: results of a cost analysis in a randomized study.

Eyjolfur Sigurdsson, Kristin Siggeirsdottir, Halldor Jonsson, Vilmundur Gudnason, Thorolfur Matthiasson, Brynjolfur Y Jonsson

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of health care finance and economics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Preoperative education for hip or knee replacement.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparing outcomes of total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty in neck of femur fracture patients: an Australian registry study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Blood management may have an impact on length of stay after total hip arthroplasty.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eyjolfur SigurdssonFaculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Iceland, Gimli v/Saemundargotu, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland. eyjolfurs@gmail.com
Kristin Siggeirsdottir
Halldor Jonsson
Vilmundur Gudnason
Thorolfur Matthiasson
Brynjolfur Y Jonsson
Icelandic Heart Association · ISUniversity of Iceland · ISLund University · SEReykjavík University · IS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total hip replacement (THR) is a common and costly procedure. The number of THR is expected to increase over the coming years. Two pathways of postoperative treatment were compared in a randomized study. Fifty patients from two hospitals were randomized into a study group (SG) of 27 patients receiving preoperative and postoperative education programs, as well as home visits from an outpatient team. A control group (CG) of 23 patients received "conventional" rehabilitation augmented by a stay at a rehabilitation center if needed. All costs for the two groups both in hospitals and after discharge were collected and analyzed. On average total costs for the SG were $8,550 and $11,952 for the CG, a 28% cost reduction. Total inpatient costs were $5,225 for the SG and $6,515 for the CG. In a regression analysis the group difference is statistically significant. Adjusting for changes in the Oxford Hip Score gives effective costs (C/E). The ratio of the SGs C/E to the CGs is 0.60. That is a cost-effectiveness gain of 40%. A shorter hospital stay augmented with better preoperative education and home treatment appears to be more effective and costs less than the traditional in hospital pathway of treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansIcelandLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePhysical Therapy Modalities

Identifiers

PMID18566886
OpenAlexW2088552451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.