Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18566783›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2008

[Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of benign liver tumors and tumor-like lesions].

M Galanski, S Jördens, J Weidemann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Benign solid tumors of the liver: management in the modern era.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. "Incidentaloma" of the liver: management of a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma.HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M GalanskiInstitut für Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. galanski.m@mh-hannover.de
S Jördens
J Weidemann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benign liver tumors and tumor-like lesions cover a broad spectrum of differential diagnoses, varying from dysontogenetic cysts to pseudolesions. Focal nodular hyperplasia, adenoma and regenerating nodules play a major role in clinical practice. Based on imaging findings, these lesions can be classified as cystic or solid, solitary or multiple, and hyper- or hypovascular. Haemangioma, FNH, steroid-associated adenoma, cystadenoma and echinococcus cysts can be reliably diagnosed using imaging techniques. The same is true for pseudolesions, which are found in particular on dynamic computed tomography. Other entities such as adenoma in cirrhotic livers, angiomyolipoma, regenerating nodules or Echinococcus alveolaris cannot be safely diagnosed by imaging and require biopsy. Morphological and functional characteristics of the most common lesions in the different imaging modalities will be discussed. Where possible, a diagnostic strategy will be presented.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyHumansLiverLiver DiseasesLiver NeoplasmsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.