Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18566367›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2008

Systematic comparison of gene expression between murine memory and naive B cells demonstrates that memory B cells have unique signaling capabilities.

Mary M Tomayko, Shannon M Anderson, Catherine E Brayton, Saheli Sadanand, Natalie C Steinel, Timothy W Behrens, Mark J Shlomchik

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. IgMJournal of leukocyte biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Resident Memory B Cells in Barrier Tissues.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary M TomaykoDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. mary.tomayko@yale.edu
Shannon M Anderson
Catherine E Brayton
Saheli Sadanand
Natalie C Steinel
Timothy W Behrens
Mark J Shlomchik
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USYale University · US

Funding

Murine Memory B Cell Development and FunctionR01AI043603 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK J SHLOMCHIK · 1998 to 2026
$9.7M
Training in Investigative DermatologyT32AR007016 · NIAMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KEITH A CHOATE, MICHAEL GIRARDI · 1986 to 2026
$7.8M
B Cell Memory Regulation by Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor 1AR01AI122448 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TOMAYKO, MARY · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
Elucidating functional properties of memory B cellsK08AI078533 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TOMAYKO, MARY · 2008 to 2012
$774k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI078533NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI043603NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI122448NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007016PHS HHS A143603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory B cells play essential roles in the maintenance of long-term immunity and may be important in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease, but how these cells are distinguished from their naive precursors is poorly understood. To address this, it would be important to understand how gene expression differs between memory and naive B cells to elucidate memory-specific functions. Using model systems that help overcome the lack of murine memory-specific markers and the low frequency of Ag-specific memory and naive cells, we undertook a global comparison of gene expression between memory B cells and their naive precursors. We identified genes with differential expression and confirmed the differential expression of many of these by quantitative RT-PCR and of some of these at the protein level. Our initial analysis revealed differential expression patterns of genes that regulate signaling. Memory B cells have increased expression of genes important in regulating adenosine signaling and in modulating cAMP responses. Furthermore, memory B cells up-regulate receptors that are essential for embryonic stem cell self-renewal. We further demonstrate that one of these, leukemia inhibitory factor receptor, can initiate functional signaling in memory B cells whereas it does not in naive B cells. Thus, memory and naive B cells are intrinsically wired to signal differently from one another and express a functional signaling pathway that is known to maintain stem cells in other lineages.

Indexed as

AdenosineAnimalsB-LymphocytesBone Morphogenetic Protein Receptors, Type ICyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase RIIbeta SubunitGene Expression RegulationGTP-Binding ProteinsImmunity, InnateImmunologic MemoryIsoenzymesMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein Kinase CRNA, MessengerSignal TransductionAdenosineBmpr1a protein, mouseBone Morphogenetic Protein Receptors, Type ICyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase RIIbeta SubunitGTP-Binding ProteinsIsoenzymesPrkar2b protein, mouseProtein Kinase CRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID18566367
PMCPMC4437802
OpenAlexW2145868041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.