ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2008
Scent marking behavior as an odorant communication in mice.
Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social Context Alters Chemical Signalling and Endocrine Profiles in Two Mouse Subspecies.Journal of chemical ecology · 2026Article
- Male and female mice scent mark during social communication regardless of sexual motivation or partner identity.Cell reports · 2026Article
- Synaptic Inhibition in the Accessory Olfactory Bulb Regulates Pheromone Location Learning and Memory.FASEB bioAdvances · 2026Article
- A novel behavioral paradigm for odor-induced voluntary urination in mice.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Sex difference in the effects of ventral pallidum vasopressin 1a receptor partial knockdown on social behavior in mice.Hormones and behavior · 2025Article
- Group size affects spontaneous quantity discrimination performance in wild Western Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen dorsalis).Animal cognition · 2025Article
- Void spot assay visualization optimization for use of Void Whizzard in rats (Rattus norvegicus).Physiological reports · 2025Article
- The Mouse Social Frailty Index (mSFI): A Standardized Protocol.Bio-protocol · 2025Article
- Direct comparisons of neural activity during placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia between humans and rats.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Regularity, variability, and individuality: urine marking patterns of male mice toward stimuli representing varying degrees of kinship.Chemical senses · 2025Article
- Information sharing within a social network is key to behavioral flexibility-Lessons from mice tested under seminaturalistic conditions.Science advances · 2025Article
- Behavioral Assays in the Study of Olfaction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Prefrontal Regulation of Social Behavior and Related Deficits: Insights From Rodent Studies.Biological psychiatry · 2024Review
- Alterations in KIDINS220/ARMS Expression Impact Sensory Processing and Social Behavior in Adult Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Latrine site selection by African clawless otters,Journal of mammalogy · 2024Article
- Modulation of marble-burying behavior in adult versus adolescent C57BL/6J mice of both sexes by ethologically relevant chemosensory stimuli.Oxford open neuroscience · 2024Article
- A vasopressin circuit that modulates sex-specific social interest and anxiety-like behavior in mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Biased brain and behavioral responses towards kin in males of a communally breeding species.Scientific reports · 2023Article
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In rodents, where chemical signals play a particularly important role in determining intraspecies interactions including social dominance and intersexual relationships, various studies have shown that behavior is sensitive to conspecific odor cues. Mice use urinary scent marks for communication with individual conspecifics in many social contexts. Urinary scent involves genetic information about individuals such as species, sex, and individual identity as well as metabolic information such as social dominance, and reproductive and health status, which are mediated by chemical proteins in scent marks including the major histocompatibility complex and the major urinary proteins. The odor of the predator which can be considered to be a threatening signal for the prey also modulate mouse behavior in which scent marking is suppressed in response to the cat odor exposure in mice. These odorant chemicals are detected and recognized through two olfactory bulbs, the role of which in detection of chemosignals with biological relevant appears to be differential, but partly overlapped. Mice deposit scent marks toward conspecifics to maintain their social relationships, and inhibit scent marking in a context where natural predator, cat odor is contained. This suppression of scent marking is long-lasting (for at least 7 days) and context-dependent, while the odorant signaling to conspecifics tends to appear frequently (over 24h but less than 7 days intervals) depending on the familiarity of each signal-recipient. It has been discussed that scent marking is a communicative behavior associated with territoriality toward conspecifics, indicating that the social signaling within species are sensitive to predator odor cues in terms of vulnerability to predation risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.