Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18565235›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2008

Coupling amplified DNA from flow-sorted chromosomes to high-density SNP mapping in barley.

Hana Simková, Jan T Svensson, Pascal Condamine, Eva Hribová, Pavla Suchánková, Prasanna R Bhat, Jan Bartos, Jan Safár, Timothy J Close, Jaroslav Dolezel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Flow Cytometric Analysis and Sorting of Plant Chromosomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Isolation and Sequencing of Chromosome Arm 7RS of Rye,International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Flow karyotyping of wheat-Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Chromosome analysis and sorting.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Journal of cereal science · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hana SimkováLaboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Cytometry, Institute of Experimental Botany, Sokolovská 6, CZ-77200 Olomouc, Czech Republic. simkovah@ueb.cas.cz
Jan T Svensson
Pascal Condamine
Eva Hribová
Pavla Suchánková
Prasanna R Bhat
Jan Bartos
Jan Safár
Timothy J Close
Jaroslav Dolezel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlow cytometry facilitates sorting of single chromosomes and chromosome arms which can be used for targeted genome analysis. However, the recovery of microgram amounts of DNA needed for some assays requires sorting of millions of chromosomes which is laborious and time consuming. Yet, many genomic applications such as development of genetic maps or physical mapping do not require large DNA fragments. In such cases time-consuming de novo sorting can be minimized by utilizing whole-genome amplification.

resultsHere we report a protocol optimized in barley including amplification of DNA from only ten thousand chromosomes, which can be isolated in less than one hour. Flow-sorted chromosomes were treated with proteinase K and amplified using Phi29 multiple displacement amplification (MDA). Overnight amplification in a 20-microlitre reaction produced 3.7 - 5.7 micrograms DNA with a majority of products between 5 and 30 kb. To determine the purity of sorted fractions and potential amplification bias we used quantitative PCR for specific genes on each chromosome. To extend the analysis to a whole genome level we performed an oligonucleotide pool assay (OPA) for interrogation of 1524 loci, of which 1153 loci had known genetic map positions. Analysis of unamplified genomic DNA of barley cv. Akcent using this OPA resulted in 1426 markers with present calls. Comparison with three replicates of amplified genomic DNA revealed >99% concordance. DNA samples from amplified chromosome 1H and a fraction containing chromosomes 2H - 7H were examined. In addition to loci with known map positions, 349 loci with unknown map positions were included. Based on this analysis 40 new loci were mapped to 1H.

conclusionThe results indicate a significant potential of using this approach for physical mapping. Moreover, the study showed that multiple displacement amplification of flow-sorted chromosomes is highly efficient and representative which considerably expands the potential of chromosome flow sorting in plant genomics.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantFlow CytometryGenetic MarkersHordeumNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPhysical Chromosome MappingPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, PlantGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID18565235
PMCPMC2453526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.