ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Genome-scale cluster analysis of replicated microarrays using shrinkage correlation coefficient.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iterative sure independent ranking and screening for drug response prediction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Cluster analysis of replicated alternative polyadenylation data using canonical correlation analysis.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Analyzing the similarity of samples and genes by MG-PCC algorithm, t-SNE-SS and t-SNE-SG maps.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- An ancient and conserved function for Armadillo-related proteins in the control of spore and seed germination by abscisic acid.The New phytologist · 2016Article
- The decision to germinate is regulated by divergent molecular networks in spores and seeds.The New phytologist · 2016Article
- A systematic comparison of genome-scale clustering algorithms.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Extended local similarity analysis (eLSA) of microbial community and other time series data with replicates.BMC systems biology · 2011Article
- Dynamics of dendritic cell maturation are identified through a novel filtering strategy applied to biological time-course microarray replicates.BMC immunology · 2010Article
- Discovering transcriptional modules by Bayesian data integration.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- A new symbolic representation for the identification of informative genes in replicated microarray experiments.Omics : a journal of integrative biology · 2010Article
- Importance of replication in analyzing time-series gene expression data: corticosteroid dynamics and circadian patterns in rat liver.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- R/BHC: fast Bayesian hierarchical clustering for microarray data.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Systems biology coupled with label-free high-throughput detection as a novel approach for diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Respiratory research · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, clustering with some form of correlation coefficient as the gene similarity metric has become a popular method for profiling genomic data. The Pearson correlation coefficient and the standard deviation (SD)-weighted correlation coefficient are the two most widely-used correlations as the similarity metrics in clustering microarray data. However, these two correlations are not optimal for analyzing replicated microarray data generated by most laboratories. An effective correlation coefficient is needed to provide statistically sufficient analysis of replicated microarray data.
resultsIn this study, we describe a novel correlation coefficient, shrinkage correlation coefficient (SCC), that fully exploits the similarity between the replicated microarray experimental samples. The methodology considers both the number of replicates and the variance within each experimental group in clustering expression data, and provides a robust statistical estimation of the error of replicated microarray data. The value of SCC is revealed by its comparison with two other correlation coefficients that are currently the most widely-used (Pearson correlation coefficient and SD-weighted correlation coefficient) using statistical measures on both synthetic expression data as well as real gene expression data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Two leading clustering methods, hierarchical and k-means clustering were applied for the comparison. The comparison indicated that using SCC achieves better clustering performance. Applying SCC-based hierarchical clustering to the replicated microarray data obtained from germinating spores of the fern Ceratopteris richardii, we discovered two clusters of genes with shared expression patterns during spore germination. Functional analysis suggested that some of the genetic mechanisms that control germination in such diverse plant lineages as mosses and angiosperms are also conserved among ferns.
conclusionThis study shows that SCC is an alternative to the Pearson correlation coefficient and the SD-weighted correlation coefficient, and is particularly useful for clustering replicated microarray data. This computational approach should be generally useful for proteomic data or other high-throughput analysis methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.