ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Precise detection of rearrangement breakpoints in mammalian chromosomes.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic architecture of endogenous ichnoviruses reveals distinct evolutionary pathways leading to virus domestication in parasitic wasps.BMC biology · 2020Article
- Large-scale mammalian genome rearrangements coincide with chromatin interactions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Divergent genome evolution caused by regional variation in DNA gain and loss between human and mouse.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Two genomes of highly polyphagous lepidopteran pests (Spodoptera frugiperda, Noctuidae) with different host-plant ranges.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Recombination rate variation in mice from an isolated island.Molecular ecology · 2017Article
- Partially local three-way alignments and the sequence signatures of mitochondrial genome rearrangements.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2017Article
- Article
- Refining borders of genome-rearrangements including repetitions.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Reexamining the P-Element Invasion of Drosophila melanogaster Through the Lens of piRNA Silencing.Genetics · 2016Review
- Detection of gene expression changes at chromosomal rearrangement breakpoints in evolution.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- The rise and fall of breakpoint reuse depending on genome resolution.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Positional orthology: putting genomic evolutionary relationships into context.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2011Review
- An alternative approach to multiple genome comparison.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Close 3D proximity of evolutionary breakpoints argues for the notion of spatial synteny.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Cassis: detection of genomic rearrangement breakpoints.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- Open chromatin encoded in DNA sequence is the signature of 'master' replication origins in human cells.Nucleic acids research · 2009Article
- Analysis of fine-scale mammalian evolutionary breakpoints provides new insight into their relation to genome organisation.BMC genomics · 2009Article
- Footprints of inversions at present and past pseudoautosomal boundaries in human sex chromosomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2009Article
- Assessing the quality of whole genome alignments in bacteria.Advances in bioinformatics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomes undergo large structural changes that alter their organisation. The chromosomal regions affected by these rearrangements are called breakpoints, while those which have not been rearranged are called synteny blocks. We developed a method to precisely delimit rearrangement breakpoints on a genome by comparison with the genome of a related species. Contrary to current methods which search for synteny blocks and simply return what remains in the genome as breakpoints, we propose to go further and to investigate the breakpoints themselves in order to refine them.
resultsGiven some reliable and non overlapping synteny blocks, the core of the method consists in refining the regions that are not contained in them. By aligning each breakpoint sequence against its specific orthologous sequences in the other species, we can look for weak similarities inside the breakpoint, thus extending the synteny blocks and narrowing the breakpoints. The identification of the narrowed breakpoints relies on a segmentation algorithm and is statistically assessed. Since this method requires as input synteny blocks with some properties which, though they appear natural, are not verified by current methods for detecting such blocks, we further give a formal definition and provide an algorithm to compute them. The whole method is applied to delimit breakpoints on the human genome when compared to the mouse and dog genomes. Among the 355 human-mouse and 240 human-dog breakpoints, 168 and 146 respectively span less than 50 Kb. We compared the resulting breakpoints with some publicly available ones and show that we achieve a better resolution. Furthermore, we suggest that breakpoints are rarely reduced to a point, and instead consist in often large regions that can be distinguished from the sequences around in terms of segmental duplications, similarity with related species, and transposable elements.
conclusionOur method leads to smaller breakpoints than already published ones and allows for a better description of their internal structure. In the majority of cases, our refined regions of breakpoint exhibit specific biological properties (no similarity, presence of segmental duplications and of transposable elements). We hope that this new result may provide some insight into the mechanism and evolutionary properties of chromosomal rearrangements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.