Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18562556›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2009

Motor unit recruitment and proprioceptive feedback decrease the common drive.

Carlo J De Luca, Jose A Gonzalez-Cueto, Paolo Bonato, Alexander Adam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Motor Neuron Pools of Synergistic Thigh Muscles Share Most of Their Synaptic Input.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Peripheral nerve function and lower extremity muscle power in older men.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Motor unit control and force fluctuation during fatigue.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlo J De LucaNeuroMuscular Research Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Jose A Gonzalez-Cueto
Paolo Bonato
Alexander Adam

Funding

HARNESSING MOTONEURON ACTIVITY: FROM LAB TO CLINICR24HD038585 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY · PI DE LUCA, CARLO J · 2000 to 2004
$3.0M
Harnessing Motoneuron Activity: From Lab to ClinicR01HD050111 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI DE LUCA, CARLO J · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS HD-050111NICHD NIH HHS HD-38585NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD050111NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD038585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been documented that concurrently active motor units fire under the control of a common drive. That is, the firing rates show high correlation with near-zero time lag. This degree of correlation has been found to vary among muscles and among contractions performed at different force levels in the same muscle. This study provides an explanation indicating that motor units recruited during a contraction cause an increase in the variation (SD) and a decrease in the degree (amplitude) of the correlation of the firing rates. The degree of correlation is lower in muscles having greater spindle density. This effect appears to be mediated by the proprioceptive feedback from the spindles and possibly the Golgi tendon organs. Muscle spindles in particular respond to the mechanical excitation of the nonfused muscle fibers and provide a discordant excitation to the homonymous motoneurons, resulting in a decrease in the correlation of the firing rates of motor units. The implication of this work is that the decreased correlation of the firing rates in some muscles is not necessarily an indication of a decreased common drive from the CNS, but rather an inhibitory influence of the proprioceptive feedback from the peripheral nervous system. This explanation is useful for understanding various manifestations of the common drive reported in the literature.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyAdultElectric StimulationElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalNeural InhibitionNeural PathwaysPhysical StimulationProprioceptionReaction TimeRecruitment, Neurophysiological

Identifiers

PMID18562556
PMCPMC2666397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.