ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2008
Predicting functional regulatory polymorphisms.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulatory genome variants in human susceptibility to infection.Human genetics · 2020Review
- CERENKOV3: Clustering and molecular network-derived features improve computational prediction of functional noncoding SNPs.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2020Article
- Ranking of non-coding pathogenic variants and putative essential regions of the human genome.Nature communications · 2019Article
- CERENKOV2: improved detection of functional noncoding SNPs using data-space geometric features.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Regulatory Single-Nucleotide Variant Predictor Increases Predictive Performance of Functional Regulatory Variants.Human mutation · 2016Article
- Case-only exome sequencing and complex disease susceptibility gene discovery: study design considerations.Journal of medical genetics · 2015Review
- SuRFing the genomics wave: an R package for prioritising SNPs by functionality.Genome medicine · 2014Article
- Annotating individual human genomes.Genomics · 2011Review
- Prediction of functional regulatory SNPs in monogenic and complex disease.Human mutation · 2011Article
- Identifying functional single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human CArGome.Physiological genomics · 2011Article
- Mapping allele-specific DNA methylation: a new tool for maximizing information from GWAS.American journal of human genetics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationLimited availability of data has hindered the development of algorithms that can identify functionally meaningful regulatory single nucleotide polymorphisms (rSNPs). Given the large number of common polymorphisms known to reside in the human genome, the identification of functional rSNPs via laboratory assays will be costly and time-consuming. Therefore appropriate bioinformatics strategies for predicting functional rSNPs are necessary. Recent data from the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) Project has significantly expanded the amount of available functional information relevant to non-coding regions of the genome, and, importantly, led to the conclusion that many functional elements in the human genome are not conserved.
resultsIn this article we describe how ENCODE data can be leveraged to probabilistically determine the functional and phenotypic significance of non-coding SNPs (ncSNPs). The method achieves excellent sensitivity ( approximately 80%) and speci.city ( approximately 99%) based on a set of known phenotypically relevant and non-functional SNPs. In addition, we show that our method is not overtrained through the use of cross-validation analyses. AVAILABILITY: The software platforms used in our analyses are freely available (http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/). In addition, we provide the training dataset (Supplementary Table 3), and our predictions (Supplementary Table 6), in the Supplementary Material. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.