Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1856114›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry1991

Microphotometric determination of enzymes in brain sections. IV. Isocitrate dehydrogenases.

P Kugler, S Vogel

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P KuglerDepartment of Anatomy, University of Würzburg, Federal Republic of Germany.
S Vogel
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A polyvinyl alcohol-(PVA) containing incubation medium was adapted for the microphotometric determination (kinetic and end-point measurements) of the activities of NAD- and NADP-linked isocitrate dehydrogenases (ICDHs) in cryostat sections of the rat hippocampus. The following incubation medium is recommended for the quantification of NAD- and NADP- (differences in brackets) ICDHs: 100 mM DL-isocitrate, 10 mM sodium azide, 5 mM (4 mM) nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT), 7 mM NAD (4 mM NADP), 10 mM magnesium chloride, 0.25 mM phenazine methosulfate (PMS), with or without 5 mM ADP (without ADP), 23% PVA in 0.05 M Hepes buffer; the final pH was 7.5. With these incubation media a linear response of the reactions lasted at least 20 min. In kinetic and end-point measurements the same level of activities was demonstrable. The use of NaN3 (as a blocker of the respiratory chain) and PMS (as artificial electron carrier) was indispensible for the transfer of all reduction equivalents in the dehydrogenase reactions to the tetrazolium salt NBT. Furthermore, the activation by magnesium ions and the need of PVA to avoid diffusion artefacts of the loosely bound ICDHs were clearly shown. It is concluded that the quantification of ICDHs in situ could be a valuable tool for neurochemical investigations because ICDHs play a role not only in the substrate flux through the tricarboxylic acid cycle but also in providing alpha-ketoglutarate for the formation of glutamate which is an important amino acid in the brain.

Indexed as

Brain ChemistryAnimalsAzidesHippocampusHistocytochemistryIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMethylphenazonium MethosulfateNitroblue TetrazoliumPhotometryPolyvinyl AlcoholRatsRats, Inbred StrainsSodium AzideAzidesIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMethylphenazonium MethosulfateNitroblue TetrazoliumPolyvinyl AlcoholSodium Azide

Identifiers

PMID1856114
OpenAlexW1554161730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.