Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18560524›Full record

Trial reportEnvironmental health perspectives2008

Exposure to concentrated ambient particles does not affect vascular function in patients with coronary heart disease.

Nicholas L Mills, Simon D Robinson, Paul H B Fokkens, Daan L A C Leseman, Mark R Miller, David Anderson, Evelyn J Freney, Mathew R Heal, Robert J Donovan, Anders Blomberg and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Environmental health perspectives, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cardiovascular effects of sub-daily levels of ambient fine particles: a systematic review.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2010
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells are not affected by acute systemic inflammation.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2010
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Exposure to urban particulate matter and its association with human health risks.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Roadside Exposure and Inflammation Biomarkers among a Cohort of Traffic Police in Kathmandu, Nepal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicholas L MillsCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. nick.mills@ed.ac.uk
Simon D Robinson
Paul H B Fokkens
Daan L A C Leseman
Mark R Miller
David Anderson
Evelyn J Freney
Mathew R Heal
Robert J Donovan
Anders Blomberg
Thomas Sandström
William MacNee
Nicholas A Boon
Ken Donaldson
David E Newby
Flemming R Cassee
University of Edinburgh · GBCentre for Inflammation Research · GBNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLUmeå University · SE

Funding

British Heart Foundation 03/017/15071British Heart Foundation RG/10/9/28286Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to fine particulate air pollution is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We previously demonstrated that exposure to dilute diesel exhaust causes vascular dysfunction in humans.

objectivesWe conducted a study to determine whether exposure to ambient particulate matter causes vascular dysfunction.

methodsTwelve male patients with stable coronary heart disease and 12 age-matched volunteers were exposed to concentrated ambient fine and ultrafine particles (CAPs) or filtered air for 2 hr using a randomized, double-blind cross-over study design. We measured peripheral vascular vasomotor and fibrinolytic function, and inflammatory variables-including circulating leukocytes, serum C-reactive protein, and exhaled breath 8-isoprostane and nitrotyrosine-6-8 hr after both exposures.

resultsParticulate concentrations (mean +/- SE) in the exposure chamber (190+/-37 microg/m(3)) were higher than ambient levels (31+/-8 microg/m(3)) and levels in filtered air (0.5+/-0.4 microg/m(3); p<0.001). Chemical analysis of CAPs identified low levels of elemental carbon. Exhaled breath 8-isoprostane concentrations increased after exposure to CAPs (16.9+/-8.5 vs. 4.9+/-1.2 pg/mL, p<0.05), but markers of systemic inflammation were largely unchanged. Although there was a dose-dependent increase in blood flow and plasma tissue plasminogen activator release (p<0.001 for all), CAPs exposure had no effect on vascular function in either group.

conclusionsDespite achieving marked increases in particulate matter, exposure to CAPs--low in combustion-derived particles--did not affect vasomotor or fibrinolytic function in either middle-aged healthy volunteers or patients with coronary heart disease. These findings contrast with previous exposures to dilute diesel exhaust and highlight the importance of particle composition in determining the vascular effects of particulate matter in humans.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular SystemCoronary DiseaseC-Reactive ProteinCross-Over StudiesDinoprostDouble-Blind MethodFibrinolysisHumansInhalation ExposureMaleMiddle AgedParticulate MatterTyrosineVasomotor System3-nitrotyrosine8-epi-prostaglandin F2alphaC-Reactive ProteinDinoprostParticulate MatterTyrosineair pollutionblood flowendotheliumfibrinolysisinflammation

Identifiers

PMID18560524
PMCPMC2430224
OpenAlexW2151733665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.