ReviewAACN advanced critical care
Design, analysis, and interpretation of method-comparison studies.
Review in AACN advanced critical care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
97 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Laminar airflow ventilation systems in orthopaedic operating room do not prevent surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The validity of the modification of diet in renal disease formula in HIV-infected patients: a systematic review.Journal of nephrology · 2014Pooled it
- Trial
- Low-dose chest computed tomography for quantitative and visual anatomical analysis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Intensive care medicine · 2014Trial
- Use of the Teager-Kaiser Energy operator for muscle activity detection in children.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2009Trial
- Monochromatic X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy for major and trace element analysis in plant science applications.Plant and soil · 2026Article
- Madison Objective Self-Assessment Tool: A Reliable and User-Friendly Approach for Objective Self-Assessment in Microvascular Anastomosis Training.Neurosurgery practice · 2025Article
- Comparison of Imaging Modalities for Left Ventricular Noncompaction Morphology.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Emerging Models of Care Using IT in Long-Term/Post-Acute Care: A Comparative Analysis of Human and AI-Driven Qualitative Insights.Journal of gerontological nursing · 2025Article
- Evaluating the reliability of a microperimetry-based method for assessing visual function in the junctional zone of geographic atrophy lesions.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Reliability of a Microperimetry-Based Method for Assessing Visual Function in the Junctional Zone of Geographic Atrophy Lesions.Research square · 2024Article
- Dairy intake screener as web-based application is reliable and valid.Food science & nutrition · 2024Article
- Two-dimensional transthoracic measure of mitral annulus in mitral valve prolapse and moderate to severe regurgitation: a method comparison analysis with three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Using Deep Learning and B-Splines to Model Blood Vessel Lumen from 3D Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Analytical Validation of Aptamer-Based Serum Vancomycin Monitoring Relative to Automated Immunoassays.ACS sensors · 2024Article
- Replacement of fluoroscopy by ultrasonography in the evaluation of hemidiaphragm function, an exploratory prospective study.The ultrasound journal · 2024Article
- Accuracy of self-reported height, weight, and waist circumference in poor, rural areas of China.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Evaluation of CI electrode position from imaging: comparison of an automated technique with the established manual method.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- A modified subcostal view: a novel method for measuring the LVOT VTI.Journal of ultrasound · 2023Observational
37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Clinicians often need to know whether a new method of measurement is equivalent to an established one already in clinical use. This article reviews the methodology of a method-comparison study to assist the clinician with the conduct and evaluation of such studies. Temperature data from 1 subject are used to illustrate the procedures. Although one would not make decisions on the basis of the findings from 1 subject, the large number of paired measurements in the data set permits its use for illustrative purposes. Currently available software eliminates the need for tedious statistical computation but does not reduce the burden of understanding the concepts underlying a method-comparison study and accurate interpretation of the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.