Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18559820›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2008

Near neutrality: leading edge of the neutral theory of molecular evolution.

Austin L Hughes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cancer Relevance of Human Genes.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Article
  11. Decoding the effects of synonymous variants.Nucleic acids research · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Self-compatibility in peach [Horticulture research · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Resolving genetic heterogeneity in cancer.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Multiple Novel Mutations inThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Austin L HughesDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Coker Life Sciences Bldg., 700 Sumter St., Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA. austin@biol.sc.edu

Funding

POLYMORPHISM &EVOLUTION OF MHC GENESR01GM043940 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HUGHES, AUSTIN L. · 1990 to 2010
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM43940NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nearly neutral theory represents a development of Kimura's neutral theory of molecular evolution that makes testable predictions that go beyond a mere null model. Recent evidence has strongly supported several of these predictions, including the prediction that slightly deleterious variants will accumulate in a species that has undergone a severe bottleneck or in cases where recombination is reduced or absent. Because bottlenecks often occur in speciation and slightly deleterious mutations in coding regions will usually be nonsynonymous, we should expect that the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous fixed differences between species should often exceed the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous polymorphisms within species. Many data support this prediction, although they have often been wrongly interpreted as evidence for positive Darwinian selection. The use of conceptually flawed tests for positive selection has become widespread in recent years, seriously harming the quest for an understanding of genome evolution. When properly analyzed, many (probably most) claimed cases of positive selection will turn out to involve the fixation of slightly deleterious mutations by genetic drift in bottlenecked populations. Slightly deleterious variants are a transient feature of evolution in the long term, but they have substantially affected contemporary species, including our own.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic DriftModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticAnimalsHumansPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID18559820
PMCPMC2707937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.