ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2008
Neostigmine but not sugammadex impairs upper airway dilator muscle activity and breathing.
Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Deep Curarisation and Reversal With Sugammadex on Surgical Conditions and Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery
Visualization of Regional Lung Ventilation During Neostigmine or Sugammadex Enhanced Recovery From Moderate Residual Neuromuscular Blockade in the Anaesthetized Rat Using Functional Respiratory Imaging
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sugammadex vs neostigmine in post-anesthesia recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Current recommendations for preventing residual neuromuscular blockade.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026Review
- Sugammadex and emergence-related respiratory adverse events in pediatric tonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Article
- Eliminating residual neuromuscular blockade: a literature review.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2021Article
- ROUTINE USE OF SUGAMMADEX DOES NOT SHORTEN PACU LENGTH OF STAY: A PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE-BLINDED RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.Perioperative care and operating room management · 2021Article
- Does Sugammadex Reduce Postoperative Airway Failure?Anesthesia and analgesia · 2020Article
- Acyclic Cucurbit[n]uril-Type Containers as Receptors for Neuromuscular Blocking Agents: Structure-Binding Affinity Relationships.Croatica chemica acta. Arhiv za kemiju · 2019Article
- Is lower-dose sugammadex a cost-saving strategy for reversal of deep neuromuscular block? Facts and fiction.BMC anesthesiology · 2018Review
- Reversal agents: do we need to administer with neuromuscular monitoring - an observational study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2018Article
- Reevaluation and update on efficacy and safety of neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018Review
- Development of an algorithm using clinical tests to avoid post-operative residual neuromuscular block.BMC anesthesiology · 2017Article
- Observational
- Comparative Effectiveness of Calabadion and Sugammadex to Reverse Non-depolarizing Neuromuscular-blocking Agents.Anesthesiology · 2015Article
- The Effects of Sugammadex on Progesterone Levels in Pregnant Rats.Balkan medical journal · 2015Article
- Neostigmine and pulmonary oedema.BMJ case reports · 2014Article
- Negative pressure pulmonary edema after reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex.Case reports in anesthesiology · 2014Article
- Intermediate acting non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents and risk of postoperative respiratory complications: prospective propensity score matched cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2012Article
- Non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema after neostigmine given for reversal: A report of two cases.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCholinesterase inhibitor-based reversal agents, given in the absence of neuromuscular block, evoke a partial upper airway obstruction by decreasing skeletal upper airway muscle function. Sugammadex reverses neuromuscular block by encapsulating rocuronium. However, its effects on upper airway integrity and breathing are unknown.
methodsFifty-one adult male rats were anaesthetized with isoflurane, tracheostomized, and a femoral artery and vein were cannulated. First, we compared the efficacy of sugammadex 15 mg kg(-1) and neostigmine 0.06 mg kg(-1) to reverse respiratory effects of rocuronium-induced partial paralysis [train-of-four ratio (T4/T1)=0.5]. Subsequently, we compared the safety of sugammadex and neostigmine given after recovery of the T4/T1 to 1, by measuring phasic genioglossus activity and breathing.
resultsDuring partial paralysis (T4/T1=0.5), time to recovery of minute volume to baseline values was 10.9 (2), 75.8 (18), and 153 (54) s with sugammadex, neostigmine, and placebo, respectively (sugammadex was significantly faster than neostigmine and placebo, P<0.05). Recovery of T4/T1 was also faster for sugammadex than neostigmine and placebo. Neostigmine administration after complete recovery of T4/T1 decreased upper airway dilator muscle activity to 64 (30)% of baseline and decreased tidal volume (P<0.05 for both variables), whereas sugammadex had no effect on either variable.
conclusionsIn contrast to neostigmine, which significantly impairs upper airway dilator muscle activity when given after recovery from neuromuscular block, a reversal dose of sugammadex given under the same conditions does not affect genioglossus muscle activity and normal breathing. Human studies will be required to evaluate the clinical relevance of our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.