Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18558793›Full record

SynthesisDrug safety2008

Ethnic differences in the risks of adverse reactions to drugs used in the treatment of psychoses and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sara Ormerod, Sarah E McDowell, Jamie J Coleman, Robin E Ferner

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug safety, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antipsychotic Polypharmacy: A Dirty Little Secret or a Fashion?The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
  10. Physical Health Outcomes in Preschoolers with Prior Authorization for Antipsychotics.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara OrmerodQueen Elizabeth Psychiatric Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Sarah E McDowell
Jamie J Coleman
Robin E Ferner
University of Birmingham · GBBirmingham City Hospital · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFactors such as age, sex and disease state alter a patient's susceptibility to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Ethnicity may also alter the risk of an ADR.

objectiveTo review the evidence for ethnic differences in susceptibility to adverse reactions to drugs used to treat psychoses and depression. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (from 1951), EMBASE (from 1974), and PsycINFO (from 1950) to March 2006. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if there was a mention of ethnicity, ethnic or racial groups and a description of a procedure to investigate ADRs specifically or a description of ADRs that were a result of drugs in therapeutic use. Studies selected by any two reviewers were retained if they referred to drugs used in the treatment of psychoses and related disorders or antidepressant drugs. Of 124 studies describing ADRs to antipsychotics or antidepressants, 51 reported data from different ethnic groups. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted independently from those studies selected for inclusion by two reviewers, using a standard data extraction form. Studies were assessed for bias in order to determine the quality of the study. DATA SYNTHESIS: In a pooled analysis of patients treated with antipsychotics, the relative risk (RR) of tardive dyskinesia in Black compared with White patients was 1.03 (95% CI 0.85, 1.24); the RR of extrapyramidal symptoms in East Asian compared with non-East Asian patients was 1.38 (95% CI 1.11, 1.72); the RR of hyperglycaemia in Black compared with non-Black patients was 1.55 (95% CI 0.95, 2.53); and the RR of diabetes mellitus in non-White compared with White patients was 1.35 (95% CI 0.95, 1.92). It was impossible to perform pooled analysis of data from studies investigating antidepressants due to insufficient data.

conclusionsWe found limited evidence of ethnic differences in the risk of ADRs. The clinical implications of these results remain unclear because of confounding factors. Further progress will require improved recruitment of patients from different ethnic groups and an established consensus on how to define ethnicity.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsAsian PeopleBasal Ganglia DiseasesDyskinesiasHumansHyperglycemiaWeight GainWhite PeopleAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID18558793
OpenAlexW2092264845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.