ArticleGenetics2008
Efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation of Bayesian analysis of additive and dominance genetic variances in noninbred pedigrees.
Article in Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Principal component analysis revisited: fast multitrait genetic evaluations with smooth convergence.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Integrating targeted genetic markers to genotyping-by-sequencing for an ultimate genotyping tool.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- 3D-GBS: a universal genotyping-by-sequencing approach for genomic selection and other high-throughput low-cost applications in species with small to medium-sized genomes.Plant methods · 2023Article
- Genetic and genomic characterization followed by single-step genomic evaluation of withers height in German Warmblood horses.Journal of applied genetics · 2022Article
- Genomic prediction of preliminary yield trials in chickpea: Effect of functional annotation of SNPs and environment.The plant genome · 2022Article
- Multi-trait multi-environment models in the genetic selection of segregating soybean progeny.PloS one · 2019Article
- Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Article
- Candidate gene association mapping of Sclerotinia stalk rot resistance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) uncovers the importance of COI1 homologs.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2014Article
- Bayesian inference of mixed models in quantitative genetics of crop species.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2013Article
- Article
- Bayesian inference of genetic parameters based on conditional decompositions of multivariate normal distributions.Genetics · 2010Article
- Bayesian quantitative trait locus mapping based on reconstruction of recent genetic histories.Genetics · 2009Article
- Optimum contribution selection in large general tree breeding populations with an application to Scots pine.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and fast computation of quantitative genetic variance parameters is of great importance in both natural and breeding populations. For experimental designs with complex relationship structures it can be important to include both additive and dominance variance components in the statistical model. In this study, we introduce a Bayesian Gibbs sampling approach for estimation of additive and dominance genetic variances in the traditional infinitesimal model. The method can handle general pedigrees without inbreeding. To optimize between computational time and good mixing of the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains, we used a hybrid Gibbs sampler that combines a single site and a blocked Gibbs sampler. The speed of the hybrid sampler and the mixing of the single-site sampler were further improved by the use of pretransformed variables. Two traits (height and trunk diameter) from a previously published diallel progeny test of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and two large simulated data sets with different levels of dominance variance were analyzed. We also performed Bayesian model comparison on the basis of the posterior predictive loss approach. Results showed that models with both additive and dominance components had the best fit for both height and diameter and for the simulated data with high dominance. For the simulated data with low dominance, we needed an informative prior to avoid the dominance variance component becoming overestimated. The narrow-sense heritability estimates in the Scots pine data were lower compared to the earlier results, which is not surprising because the level of dominance variance was rather high, especially for diameter. In general, the hybrid sampler was considerably faster than the blocked sampler and displayed better mixing properties than the single-site sampler.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.