Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18557614›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2008

Highly efficient circulating tumor cell isolation from whole blood and label-free enumeration using polymer-based microfluidics with an integrated conductivity sensor.

André A Adams, Paul I Okagbare, Juan Feng, Matuesz L Hupert, Don Patterson, Jost Göttert, Robin L McCarley, Dimitris Nikitopoulos, Michael C Murphy, Steven A Soper

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 520 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Circulating Tumor Cells: Emerging Frontiers in Cancer Technology.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

André A AdamsDepartment of Chemistry, Center for BioModular Multi-scale Systems, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA.
Paul I Okagbare
Juan Feng
Matuesz L Hupert
Don Patterson
Jost Göttert
Robin L McCarley
Dimitris Nikitopoulos
Michael C Murphy
Steven A Soper
Louisiana Tech University · USLouisiana State University · US

Funding

Microsampling Unit for Capturing Low Abundant CellsR33CA099246 · NCI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI SOPER, STEVEN ALLAN · 2004 to 2006
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS 1R33-CA09924601NCI NIH HHS R33 CA099246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel microfluidic device that can selectively and specifically isolate exceedingly small numbers of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) through a monoclonal antibody (mAB) mediated process by sampling large input volumes (>/=1 mL) of whole blood directly in short time periods (<37 min) was demonstrated. The CTCs were concentrated into small volumes (190 nL), and the number of cells captured was read without labeling using an integrated conductivity sensor following release from the capture surface. The microfluidic device contained a series (51) of high-aspect ratio microchannels (35 mum width x 150 mum depth) that were replicated in poly(methyl methacrylate), PMMA, from a metal mold master. The microchannel walls were covalently decorated with mABs directed against breast cancer cells overexpressing the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM). This microfluidic device could accept inputs of whole blood, and its CTC capture efficiency was made highly quantitative (>97%) by designing capture channels with the appropriate widths and heights. The isolated CTCs were readily released from the mAB capturing surface using trypsin. The released CTCs were then enumerated on-device using a novel, label-free solution conductivity route capable of detecting single tumor cells traveling through the detection electrodes. The conductivity readout provided near 100% detection efficiency and exquisite specificity for CTCs due to scaling factors and the nonoptimal electrical properties of potential interferences (erythrocytes or leukocytes). The simplicity in manufacturing the device and its ease of operation make it attractive for clinical applications requiring one-time use operation.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingAntibodies, MonoclonalBreast NeoplasmsCell Adhesion MoleculesCell Line, TumorCell SeparationElectric ConductivityElectrodesHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNeoplasmsPolymethyl MethacrylateAntibodies, MonoclonalCell Adhesion MoleculesPolymethyl Methacrylate

Identifiers

PMID18557614
PMCPMC2526315
OpenAlexW1968562444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.