ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2008
Confirmation of single exon deletions in MLH1 and MSH2 using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of targeted nanopore sequencing for the screening and determination of structural variants in patients with Lynch syndrome.Journal of human genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Evaluation of microsatellite instability in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.Oncology letters · 2012Article
- LightCycler technology in molecular diagnostics.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Deletions of one or more exons in the mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 have been implicated in a significant fraction of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC or Lynch syndrome). Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) detection of deletions of multiple sequential exons is widely accepted; however, there is concern over the reliability of MLPA results showing single exon deletions. Given the clinical implications of a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome, it is important to use an alternative technique to confirm single exon deletions. To verify single exon deletions, we developed a SYBR Green-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Clinical DNA samples containing deletions in 33 of the 35 exons in MLH1 and MSH2, previously screened by MLPA, were evaluated by quantitative PCR. Gene dosage ratios were determined by both the relative standard curve method and by the 2(-DeltaDeltaC(T)) method. Deleted exons had gene dosage ratios of 0.4 to 0.6, while nondeleted exons exhibited ratios of 0.8-1.3. We found 100% concordance between the quantitative PCR and MLPA results, including confirmation of all single exon deletions. The 2(-DeltaDeltaC(T)) method was as accurate as using standard curves for the calculation of ratios. Single exon deletions in MLH1 and MSH2 can be verified using quantitative PCR. Assays using this method are simple to design and easy to perform, making them ideal for confirmatory testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.