Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18553236›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2008

Evaluation of circulating tumor cells in patients with breast cancer: multi-institutional clinical trial in Japan.

Hiroshi Yagata, Seigo Nakamura, Masakazu Toi, Hiroko Bando, Shinji Ohno, Akemi Kataoka

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03979339 (Feasibility of a New Technology for Isolating Circulating Tumour Cells in Selected Cancer Patients and Healthy Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03979339 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of a New Technology for Isolating Circulating Tumour Cells in Selected Cancer Patients and Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Oscar LambretRan2020 to 2023Enrolled76ConditionsHER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Hormone-resistant Prostate Cancer, Circulating Tumor CellArmsBlood sample collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Clinical application of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions and circulating tumor cells.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hiroshi YagataDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, St Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8560, Japan. yagata@mvh.biglobe.ne.jp
Seigo Nakamura
Masakazu Toi
Hiroko Bando
Shinji Ohno
Akemi Kataoka

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the development of the CellSearch System, it has become possible to measure circulating tumor cell (CTC) levels with high reproducibility, and the CTC test is currently being used clinically for patients with metastatic breast cancer in the United States. It is imperative that the clinical significance of the CTC test also be examined in Japan.

methodsUsing the CellSearch System, CTC levels were evaluated in 57 healthy individuals and patients with benign breast disease; 30 patients with primary breast cancer (stages 1-3); and 38 patients with metastatic breast cancer. First, the relationship between CTC levels and the presence of metastasis was examined using a cutoff score of 2 CTCs per 7.5 ml whole blood. Then, the patients with metastatic breast cancer were divided into two groups, using a cutoff score of 5 CTCs per 7.5 ml blood, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in the two groups.

resultsWhen the clinical cutoff score was set at 2 CTCs per 7.5 ml blood, 0% of the healthy individuals and patients with benign breast disease (0/57), 3.3% of the patients with primary breast cancer (1/30), and 50% of the patients with metastatic breast cancer (19/38) were identified as as having 2 CTCs per 7.5 ml blood. Additionally, with a cutoff score of 5 CTCs, 11 patients were reported to have 5 or more CTCs and both PFS (P = 0.0036) and OS (P = 0.04) were worse for this patient population than for the population with fewer than 5 CTCs.

conclusionAs concluded in a similar clinical trial in the United States, for patients with breast cancer, measuring CTC levels can be both an accurate indicator of metastases and an important measure of patient prognosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCell CountCell SeparationDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingSurvival RateTumor Burden

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.