Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18553049›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgery2008

Incidental pancreatic cystic lesions.

Senarath Edirimanne, Saxon J Connor

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgery, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Management of mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.World journal of gastroenterology · 2010
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Natural History of Patients Followed Radiographically with Mucinous Cysts of the Pancreas.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Giant mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2010
    Article
  10. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2010
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Senarath EdirimanneDepartment of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Private Bag 4710, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Saxon J Connor
Christchurch Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncidental pancreatic cystic lesions (IPCL) are becoming an increasingly frequent clinical entity. Within this review, the differential diagnosis, investigation, and management are discussed.

methodsA MEDLINE search was performed for IPCL.

resultsIncidence of IPCL varies from 0.2-0.7%, and 30-47% are premalignant or malignant. Pancreatic pseudocysts (PC), serous cystic neoplasms (SCN), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) are the most common pathological entities of IPCL. The use of combined modalities, including clinical characteristics, serum tumor markers, cross-sectional imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with cyst fluid analysis should all be used to establish an accurate preoperative diagnosis if possible. Modern multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance pancreatography (MRP) allow detailed characterization of IPCL, including size, septation, calcifications, mural nodules, and communication with main pancreatic duct. The best available cyst fluid markers of mucinous neoplasm are viscosity > or =1.6 and carcinoembryonic antigen >192 ng/ml. Although surgery is indicated for MCN or main or mixed duct IPMN, recent advances in the understanding of the natural history and increasingly accurate preoperative diagnosis allow a nonoperative approach to be undertaken for the majority of IPCL. For those treated nonoperatively, the ideal follow-up has yet to be determined.

conclusionsEmerging evidence supports selective nonoperative management for the majority of patients who have IPCL when investigated by a multimodal approach. For those in whom a suspicion of malignancy remains, surgery is indicated.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ImagingHumansIncidenceIncidental FindingsPancreatic CystPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID18553049
OpenAlexW2008803330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.