ReviewWorld journal of surgery2008
Incidental pancreatic cystic lesions.
Review in World journal of surgery, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of transcriptome data identifies a novel 5-gene pancreatic adenocarcinoma classifier.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Management of mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.World journal of gastroenterology · 2010Pooled it
- Differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms through a radiomics-assisted system.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Experience-based surgical approach to pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms with ovarian-type stroma.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Natural History of Patients Followed Radiographically with Mucinous Cysts of the Pancreas.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017Article
- Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: a case report with review of the diagnostic dilemmas and tumor behavior.Oman medical journal · 2013Article
- Multidisciplinary management strategy for incidental cystic lesions of the pancreas.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2010Article
- Giant mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2010Article
- Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2010Review
- MicroRNA miR-155 is a biomarker of early pancreatic neoplasia.Cancer biology & therapy · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIncidental pancreatic cystic lesions (IPCL) are becoming an increasingly frequent clinical entity. Within this review, the differential diagnosis, investigation, and management are discussed.
methodsA MEDLINE search was performed for IPCL.
resultsIncidence of IPCL varies from 0.2-0.7%, and 30-47% are premalignant or malignant. Pancreatic pseudocysts (PC), serous cystic neoplasms (SCN), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) are the most common pathological entities of IPCL. The use of combined modalities, including clinical characteristics, serum tumor markers, cross-sectional imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with cyst fluid analysis should all be used to establish an accurate preoperative diagnosis if possible. Modern multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance pancreatography (MRP) allow detailed characterization of IPCL, including size, septation, calcifications, mural nodules, and communication with main pancreatic duct. The best available cyst fluid markers of mucinous neoplasm are viscosity > or =1.6 and carcinoembryonic antigen >192 ng/ml. Although surgery is indicated for MCN or main or mixed duct IPMN, recent advances in the understanding of the natural history and increasingly accurate preoperative diagnosis allow a nonoperative approach to be undertaken for the majority of IPCL. For those treated nonoperatively, the ideal follow-up has yet to be determined.
conclusionsEmerging evidence supports selective nonoperative management for the majority of patients who have IPCL when investigated by a multimodal approach. For those in whom a suspicion of malignancy remains, surgery is indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.