ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2008
Low concentrations of tetrodotoxin interact with tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channels.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Activity-Based Methionine Bioconjugation Approach To Developing Proximity-Activated Imaging Reporters.ACS central science · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeTetrodotoxin (TTX) is used to distinguish between two classes of voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC)--TTX sensitive (TTXS) and TTX resistant (TTXR). The resistance of TTXR VGSCs is thought to result from a low binding affinity of TTX, although at high TTX concentrations channel block does occur. Here, we show that, at concentrations below those which produce block, TTX can bind to TTXR VGSCs. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Whole-cell voltage clamp recordings were made from dissociated rat dorsal root ganglion neurones that expressed both TTXS and TTXR sodium currents. Voltage-gated calcium currents were blocked by 10 microM extracellular lanthanum chloride. TTXS, but not TTXR, current was suppressed by using a holding potential of -50 mV, and the effect of TTX on the isolated TTXR current was explored. KEY
resultsExtracellular application of 0.5 microM TTX produced a 40% increase in TTXR current amplitude, a negative shift in the voltage-dependence of current activation (approximately -8 mV) and inactivation (approximately -10 mV) and increased rates of current activation and inactivation. The effect of TTX on current amplitude was dose-dependent (EC50 = 364 nM). Removal of lanthanum prevented the effect of TTX on TTXR current amplitude, whereas reducing extracellular calcium did not. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings are consistent with an interpretation that TTX relieves a tonic block of the TTXR VGSC by lanthanum. We conclude that TTX binds to the TTXR VGSC at low concentrations, without blocking it. This appears to be the first demonstration of a clear distinction between binding affinity and blocking potency of a channel-blocking agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.