Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18552728›Full record

ReviewScience & practice perspectives2004

Practical considerations for the clinical use of buprenorphine.

Hendree E Jones

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science & practice perspectives, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Participant characteristics and buprenorphine dose.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2011
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Intraperitoneal injection of buprenorphine on anxiety-like behavior and alteration in expression ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. New Approaches in Drug Dependence: Opioids.Current addiction reports · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hendree E JonesJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA. Hejones@jhmi.edu
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

METHADONE AND BUPRENORPHINE--ANTE AND POST PARTUMR01DA012220 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, HENDREE E. · 1999 to 2002
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012220NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA-1-2220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buprenorphine is a new and attractive medication option for many opioid-addicted adults and their physicians. Before initiating buprenorphine treatment, providers must be aware of such critical factors as how the medication works, its efficacy and safety profile, how it is used in opioid withdrawal as well as maintenance treatment, and how patients can best be selected, educated about buprenorphine, and monitored throughout treatment. This article reviews these important issues as well as requirements for physician and staff training and needs for additional research on this unique medication.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineClinical Trials as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsEducation, ContinuingHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMethadoneNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNarcoticsOpioid-Related DisordersPatient Education as TopicPatient SelectionBuprenorphineMethadoneNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNarcotics

Identifiers

PMID18552728
PMCPMC2851017
OpenAlexW2094472738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.