Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18552401›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2008

Biophysical properties of cadherin bonds do not predict cell sorting.

Quanming Shi, Yuan-Hung Chien, Deborah Leckband

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Framework of Paracellular Transport via Nanoparticles-Induced Endothelial Leakiness.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Biophysical Tools to Study Cellular Mechanotransduction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Tuning the kinetics of cadherin adhesion.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2013
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Ideal, catch, and slip bonds in cadherin adhesion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  14. Cadherin recognition and adhesion.Current opinion in cell biology · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Quantification of the forces driving self-assembly of three-dimensional microtissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quanming ShiDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
Yuan-Hung Chien
Deborah Leckband
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

The Molecular Basis of Cadherin AdhesionR01GM051338 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI LECKBAND, DEBORAH E · 1999 to 2006
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM51338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential binding between cadherin subtypes is widely believed to mediate cell sorting during embryogenesis. However, a fundamental unanswered question is whether cell sorting is dictated by the biophysical properties of cadherin bonds, or by broader, cadherin-dependent differences in intercellular adhesion or membrane tension. This report describes atomic force microscope measurements of the strengths and dissociation rates of homophilic and heterophilic cadherin (CAD) bonds. Measurements conducted with chicken N-CAD, canine E-CAD, and Xenopus C-CAD demonstrated that all three cadherins cross-react and form multiple, intermolecular bonds. The mechanical and kinetic properties of the heterophilic bonds are similar to the homophilic interactions. The thus quantified bond parameters, together with previously reported adhesion energies were further compared with in vitro cell aggregation and sorting assays, which are thought to mimic in vivo cell sorting. Trends in quantified biophysical properties of the different cadherin bonds do not correlate with sorting outcomes. These results suggest that cell sorting in vivo and in vitro is not governed solely by biophysical differences between cadherin subtypes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysicsCadherinsCell AdhesionCell SeparationChickensCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusDogsKineticsModels, BiologicalStress, MechanicalSurface PropertiesXenopusCadherins

Identifiers

PMID18552401
PMCPMC2568938
OpenAlexW2169882872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.