Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18550573›Full record

ReviewCarcinogenesis2008

Gene-environment interaction in tobacco-related cancers.

Emanuela Taioli

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Carcinogenesis, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Multi-Omics Analysis of the Effects of Smoking on Human Tumors.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emanuela TaioliDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, 5150 Center Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA. taiolien@upmc.edu
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Vitamin D3 Modulation of Inflammation and Lung Cancer RiskP50CA090440 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SIEGFRIED, JILL M · 2001 to 2015
$34.6M
NCI NIH HHS 2P50CA090440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review summarizes the carcinogenic effects of tobacco smoke and the basis for interaction between tobacco smoke and genetic factors. Examples of published papers on gene-tobacco interaction and cancer risk are presented. The assessment of gene-environment interaction in tobacco-related cancers has been more complex than originally expected for several reasons, including the multiplicity of genes involved in tobacco metabolism, the numerous substrates metabolized by the relevant genes and the interaction of smoking with other metabolic pathways. Future studies on gene-environment interaction and cancer risk should include biomarkers of smoking dose, along with markers of quantitative historical exposure to tobacco. Epigenetic studies should be added to classic genetic analyses, in order to better understand gene-environmental interaction and individual susceptibility. Other metabolic pathways in competition with tobacco genetic metabolism/repair should be incorporated in epidemiological studies to generate a more complete picture of individual cancer risk associated with environmental exposure to carcinogens.

Indexed as

EnvironmentGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseCarcinogensDNA DamageHumansNeoplasmsNicotianaSmokeSmokingCarcinogensSmoke

Identifiers

PMID18550573
PMCPMC2733188
OpenAlexW2140167338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.