ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2008
Genomic sequencing of single microbial cells from environmental samples.
Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Application of High-Throughput Technologies for the Study of Microbiome and Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Pooled it
- Large Filamentous Bacteria Isolated From Sulphidic Sediments Reveal Novel Species and Distinct Energy and Defence Mechanisms for Survival.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Promiscuous and genome-wide recombination underlies the sequence-discrete species of the SAR11 lineage in the deep ocean.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- scMicrobe PTA: Near Complete Genomes from Single Bacterial Cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- scMicrobe PTA: near complete genomes from single bacterial cells.ISME communications · 2024Article
- A compendium of bacterial and archaeal single-cell amplified genomes from oxygen deficient marine waters.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Candidate Phyla Radiation, an Underappreciated Division of the Human Microbiome, and Its Impact on Health and Disease.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
- Single cell ecology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Article
- A rapid and sensitive system for recovery of nucleic acids from Mycobacteria sp. on archived glass slides.BMC microbiology · 2018Article
- The MAR databases: development and implementation of databases specific for marine metagenomics.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Nano-Sized and Filterable Bacteria and Archaea: Biodiversity and Function.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
- Emergent Properties of Microbial Activity in Heterogeneous Soil Microenvironments: Different Research Approaches Are Slowly Converging, Yet Major Challenges Remain.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
- Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy.The ISME journal · 2017Article
- Single-cell genomics for the masses.Nature biotechnology · 2017Article
- Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.6: data updates and feature enhancements.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Genomic features of "Candidatus Venteria ishoeyi", a new sulfur-oxidizing macrobacterium from the Humboldt Sulfuretum off Chile.PloS one · 2017Article
- Advances and applications of single-cell sequencing technologies.Molecular cell · 2015Review
- Metabolic pathways for the whole community.BMC genomics · 2014Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently developed techniques allow genomic DNA sequencing from single microbial cells [Lasken RS: Single-cell genomic sequencing using multiple displacement amplification. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007, 10:510-516]. Here, we focus on research strategies for putting these methods into practice in the laboratory setting. An immediate consequence of single-cell sequencing is that it provides an alternative to culturing organisms as a prerequisite for genomic sequencing. The microgram amounts of DNA required as template are amplified from a single bacterium by a method called multiple displacement amplification (MDA) avoiding the need to grow cells. The ability to sequence DNA from individual cells will likely have an immense impact on microbiology considering the vast numbers of novel organisms, which have been inaccessible unless culture-independent methods could be used. However, special approaches have been necessary to work with amplified DNA. MDA may not recover the entire genome from the single copy present in most bacteria. Also, some sequence rearrangements can occur during the DNA amplification reaction. Over the past two years many research groups have begun to use MDA, and some practical approaches to single-cell sequencing have been developed. We review the consensus that is emerging on optimum methods, reliability of amplified template, and the proper interpretation of 'composite' genomes which result from the necessity of combining data from several single-cell MDA reactions in order to complete the assembly. Preferred laboratory methods are considered on the basis of experience at several large sequencing centers where >70% of genomes are now often recovered from single cells. Methods are reviewed for preparation of bacterial fractions from environmental samples, single-cell isolation, DNA amplification by MDA, and DNA sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.