Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18550420›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2008

Genomic sequencing of single microbial cells from environmental samples.

Thomas Ishoey, Tanja Woyke, Ramunas Stepanauskas, Mark Novotny, Roger S Lasken

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. scMicrobe PTA: Near Complete Genomes from Single Bacterial Cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Single cell ecology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Single-cell genomics for the masses.Nature biotechnology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas IshoeyJ. Craig Venter Institute, 10355 Science Center Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, United States.
Tanja Woyke
Ramunas Stepanauskas
Mark Novotny
Roger S Lasken

Funding

WHOLE GENOME AMPLIFICATION FOR RAPID LOW COST GENOTYPINGR01HG003647 · NHGRI · J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI LASKEN, ROGER SENDER · 2005 to 2013
$3.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently developed techniques allow genomic DNA sequencing from single microbial cells [Lasken RS: Single-cell genomic sequencing using multiple displacement amplification. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007, 10:510-516]. Here, we focus on research strategies for putting these methods into practice in the laboratory setting. An immediate consequence of single-cell sequencing is that it provides an alternative to culturing organisms as a prerequisite for genomic sequencing. The microgram amounts of DNA required as template are amplified from a single bacterium by a method called multiple displacement amplification (MDA) avoiding the need to grow cells. The ability to sequence DNA from individual cells will likely have an immense impact on microbiology considering the vast numbers of novel organisms, which have been inaccessible unless culture-independent methods could be used. However, special approaches have been necessary to work with amplified DNA. MDA may not recover the entire genome from the single copy present in most bacteria. Also, some sequence rearrangements can occur during the DNA amplification reaction. Over the past two years many research groups have begun to use MDA, and some practical approaches to single-cell sequencing have been developed. We review the consensus that is emerging on optimum methods, reliability of amplified template, and the proper interpretation of 'composite' genomes which result from the necessity of combining data from several single-cell MDA reactions in order to complete the assembly. Preferred laboratory methods are considered on the basis of experience at several large sequencing centers where >70% of genomes are now often recovered from single cells. Methods are reviewed for preparation of bacterial fractions from environmental samples, single-cell isolation, DNA amplification by MDA, and DNA sequencing.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyBacteriaGenomicsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID18550420
PMCPMC3635501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.