Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18549479›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2008

Anni 2.0: a multipurpose text-mining tool for the life sciences.

Rob Jelier, Martijn J Schuemie, Antoine Veldhoven, Lambert C J Dorssers, Guido Jenster, Jan A Kors

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review of Drug Repositioning Approaches and Resources.International journal of biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mining MEDLINE for problems associated with vitamin D.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rob JelierDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Dr, Molewaterplein, Rotterdam, 3015 GE, The Netherlands. r.jelier@erasmusmc.nl.
Martijn J Schuemie
Antoine Veldhoven
Lambert C J Dorssers
Guido Jenster
Jan A Kors

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anni 2.0 is an online tool (http://biosemantics.org/anni/) to aid the biomedical researcher with a broad range of information needs. Anni provides an ontology-based interface to MEDLINE and retrieves documents and associations for several classes of biomedical concepts, including genes, drugs and diseases, with established text-mining technology. In this article we illustrate Anni's usability by applying the tool to two use cases: interpretation of a set of differentially expressed genes, and literature-based knowledge discovery.

Indexed as

SoftwareAbstracting and IndexingInformation Storage and RetrievalMEDLINE

Identifiers

PMID18549479
PMCPMC2481428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.