Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18548268›Full record

ReviewInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2009

Popcorn lung and bronchiolitis obliterans: a critical appraisal.

David Galbraith, David Weill

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Authors' response to Kreiss et al. (2009).International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2010
    Article
  6. Response to Galbraith and Weill.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David GalbraithChemRisk, Inc, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA. dgalbraith@chemrisk.com
David Weill
Stanford University · USTenaris (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo perform a critical review of a series of journal articles and Health Hazard Evaluation Reports (HHER) by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), where they have described the incidence of fixed obstructive pulmonary disease in a population of workers exposed to butter flavorings.

methodsThe clinical presentations, diagnostic modalities frequently employed and a review of the pertinent clinical literature are discussed for constrictive bronchiolitis and bronchiolitis obliterans with intraluminal polyps; two distinct forms of bronchiolitis obliterans (BO). An analysis of the NIOSH reports and scientific articles is provided, followed by suggestions for evaluating this public and occupational health concern moving forward.

findingsCases of lung disease in the food flavorings industry discussed in the literature have not been sufficiently documented to allow the conclusion that BO has been caused by diacetyl or butter flavoring. Further research is required to establish the causative agent(s).

conclusionThe diagnosis of bronchiolitis obliterans should be reserved for those individuals who have diagnostic lung biopsy findings, obtained and interpreted by clinicians who are experienced with this complex disorder.

Indexed as

Inhalation ExposureOccupational ExposureBiopsyBronchiolitis ObliteransDiacetylFlavoring AgentsHumansLungOccupational DiseasesDiacetylFlavoring Agents

Identifiers

PMID18548268
OpenAlexW2107244433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.