Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18548254›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2008

The decision-related psychosocial concerns of men with localised prostate cancer: targets for intervention and research.

Suzanne K Steginga, Emma Turner, Jenny Donovan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Psychological aspects of prostate cancer: a clinical review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2012
    Review
  9. Review
  10. The burden of prostate cancer in Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suzanne K StegingaPrograms and Research, The Cancer Council Queensland, School of Psychology, Griffith University, PO Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004 Australia. suzannesteginga@cancerqld.org.au
Emma Turner
Jenny Donovan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe decision-related psychosocial issues relevant for men with clinically localised prostate cancer.

methodsSearches were conducted across three electronic databases to search the health and psychological literature for articles examining decision-related psychosocial issues for men with localised prostate cancer and their partners. Medline, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases were examined for the period from 1990 to December 2007.

resultsMost men with localised prostate cancer want active involvement in decision-making. Difficulty in making the decision is common and decision-related distress may persist over time. Cancer-specific psychological distress (such as fear of recurrence but not overall anxiety) appears to be related to changes in PSA levels; and this distress influences treatment pathways. Decision support interventions are acceptable to men, improve knowledge and might reduce decision and cancer-related distress. However, the quality of intervention studies to date is low.

conclusionClinicians should seek to involve men and their partners in treatment decision making concurrent with decision and psychological support. There is a need for high quality randomised control trials to identify the optimal approach to decision support for men with clinically localised prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationBiomedical ResearchHumansMaleProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.