Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18548147›Full record

SynthesisThe Canadian journal of cardiology2008

Reporting on sex-based analysis in clinical trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker efficacy.

D M Rabi, N Khan, M Vallee, M A Hladunewich, S W Tobe, L Pilote

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The relationship between estrogen and renin angiotensin system components in the context of hypertension.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Outcomes in CKD: Findings From the CRIC Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2021
    Article
  17. SARS-CoV-2 infection and smoking: What is the association? A brief review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Sex differences in cardiovascular actions of the renin-angiotensin system.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

D M RabiDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta. doreen.rabi@calgaryhealthregion.ca
N Khan
M Vallee
M A Hladunewich
S W Tobe
L Pilote
McGill University Health Centre · CACentre for Advancing Health Outcomes · CAHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical practice recommendations for hypertension do not make recommendations specific to men or women. However, the sex hormones appear to modulate differently the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which plays a central role in the regulation of blood pressure. Today, little is known about the effects of sex on the efficacy of therapies that antagonize the RAS, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).

objectiveTo identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of ACEIs and ARBs in preventing major cardiovascular outcomes, determine what proportion of the trial participants were female, and evaluate whether there was any evidence of a sex difference in the efficacy of these agents.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that used either ACEIs or ARBs for the treatment of hypertension.

resultsThirteen ACEI trials and nine ARB trials were identified. Sex-specific outcome data were available in six of the ACEI trials and three of the ARB trials. These trials enrolled 74,105 patients; 39.1% were women. Seven of the nine trials indicated that ACEIs or ARBs may be slightly more beneficial in men. The magnitude of these differences, in most trials, was small.

conclusionsSex-specific data are reported in 43% of large hypertension clinical trials. Review of the trials reporting sex-specific effect sizes indicates that ACEIs and ARBs may be more effective in men.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersHumansHypertensionMorbidityPatient ComplianceSex DistributionSex FactorsTreatment OutcomeAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers

Identifiers

PMID18548147
PMCPMC2643194
OpenAlexW1981135805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.