ReviewThe Canadian journal of cardiology2008
Canadian Hypertension Education Program: the evolution of hypertension management guidelines in Canada.
Review in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recommendations on screening for high blood pressure in Canadian adults.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013Guideline
- Development and evaluation of a low-cost database solution for the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) database.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- The Role of Confidence and Knowledge in Intentions to (Not) Seek Care for Hypertension: Evidence From a National Survey.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Management of hypertension: Regional variations in a greatly improved landscape.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2010Article
- Community Nursing Practice in Hypertension Management in China: Qualitative Analysis Using a Bourdieusian Framework.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) is a unique Canadian initiative to improve awareness, treatment and control of hypertension through the education of health care professionals. It is the culmination of an over 30-year effort in the development of hypertension management recommendations in Canada. Important transitions in this evolution included adoption of a consensus approach, rigorous evidence grading, enhanced dissemination strategies, recommendation consolidation, sophisticated adjudication procedures, an annual process and the 'branding' of the effort as a distinct entity. CHEP is composed of expert health care 'volunteers', organized via steering, executive and central review committees, in conjunction with three task forces: the Recommendations Task Force, the Implementation Task Force and the Outcomes Research Task Force. CHEP espouses philosophies that strengthen effectiveness and cohesion: multiple partnerships, stakeholders, supporters and multidisciplinary participants ensure that key messages are disseminated with great impact to broad audiences. Over the past 10 years, there have been unprecedented advances in the treatment of hypertension and the reduction of related diseases in Canada. CHEP, a likely contributor, is being increasingly viewed as an international model for knowledge translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.