Reply to 'The correlation between cotransplantation of mesenchymal stem cells and higher recurrence rates in hematologic malignancy patients: outcome of a pilot clinical study' by Ning et al.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells to treat complications following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2014
   Review
2. Exogenous endothelial cells as accelerators of hematopoietic reconstitution.Journal of translational medicine · 2012
   Review
3. Effects of medium supplements on proliferation, differentiation potential, and in vitro expansion of mesenchymal stem cells.Stem cells translational medicine · 2012
   Article
4. Immunomodulatory properties of human adult and fetal multipotent mesenchymal stem cells.Journal of biomedical science · 2011
   Review
5. Emerging therapeutic approaches for multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells.Current opinion in hematology · 2010
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The correlation between cotransplantation of mesenchymal stem cells and higher recurrence rate in hematologic malignancy patients: outcome of a pilot clinical study.2008

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as