Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18548091›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2008

Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

P D Emanuel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mouse Models of CMML.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Adult Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P D EmanuelDepartment of Medicine, Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. PDEmanuel@uams.edu
University of Arkansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1982, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) was first classified in the category of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), but it always seemed somewhat out of place compared with the rest of the MDS categories. In the 1990s, many argued that there were two different forms of CMML, a proliferative type and a myelodysplastic type. Then in 2001 the World Health Organization created a new category called the mixed myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases, under which CMML was included. Although we still do not understand much about CMML pathogenesis nor do we have specific therapies for this disease, at least now most agree that it is in an appropriate category such that other areas of investigation can now proceed. On the other hand, we now understand a great deal of the pathogenesis underlying the disease now called juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML). JMML also fits in the new category of mixed myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases. JMML is an excellent model malignancy for investigating and understanding dysregulated and aberrant signal transduction in the Ras pathway. It has also served as a teaching tool for exploring inherited predispositions to cancer.

Indexed as

HumansLeukemia, Myelomonocytic, ChronicLeukemia, Myelomonocytic, Juvenile

Identifiers

PMID18548091
OpenAlexW2052954337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.