Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18548088›Full record

SynthesisJournal of human hypertension2008

Relaxation therapies for the management of primary hypertension in adults: a Cochrane review.

Ho Dickinson, F Campbell, Fr Beyer, Dj Nicolson, Jv Cook, Ga Ford, Jm Mason

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of human hypertension, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Significance of psychosocial factors in cardiology: update 2018 : Position paper of the German Cardiac Society.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Meditation smartphone application effects on prehypertensive adults' blood pressure: Dose-response feasibility trial.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Complementary and alternative medicine and cardiovascular disease: an evidence-based review.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013
    Article
  14. Labile hypertension: lessons to be learned from musical improvisation.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2009
    Article
  15. Relax, but is there rest for the blood pressure?Journal of human hypertension · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ho DickinsonNewcastle University, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. heather.dickinson@ncl.ac.uk
F Campbell
Fr Beyer
Dj Nicolson
Jv Cook
Ga Ford
Jm Mason
Newcastle University · GBDurham University · GBNewcastle Hospitals - Campus for Ageing and Vitality · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of relaxation to lower high blood pressure. We searched electronic bibliographic databases and grey literature to identify randomized controlled trials comparing relaxation therapies with no active treatment or sham therapy, enrolling adult participants with raised systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or = 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 85 mm Hg and follow-up > or = 8 weeks. Twenty-five trials with up to 5 years follow-up, assessing 1198 participants, met our inclusion criteria and were meta-analysed. Overall, relaxation resulted in small, statistically significant reductions in SBP (mean difference: -5.5 mm Hg, 95% CI: -8.2 to -2.8) and DBP (mean difference: -3.5 mm Hg, 95% CI: -5.3 to -1.6) compared to the control. Substantial heterogeneity between trials (I2 > 70%) was not explained by duration of follow-up, type of control, type of relaxation therapy or baseline blood pressure. The 9 trials that reported blinding of outcome assessors found a non-significant net reduction in blood pressure (SBP mean difference: -3.2 mm Hg, 95% CI: -7.7 to 1.4) associated with relaxation, as did the 15 trials comparing relaxation with sham therapy (SBP mean difference: -3.5 mm Hg, 95% CI: -7.1 to 0.2). Adequate randomization was confirmed in only seven trials and concealment of allocation in only one. In view of the poor quality of the included trials and unexplained variation between trials, the evidence in favour of a causal association between relaxation and blood pressure reduction is weak. Some of the apparent benefit of relaxation was probably due to aspects of treatment unrelated to relaxation.

Indexed as

Blood PressureRelaxation TherapyAdultHumansHypertensionRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID18548088
OpenAlexW2060172817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.