Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18547443›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2008

Resistance of mitochondrial p53 to dominant inhibition.

Kristina Heyne, Katrin Schmitt, Daniel Mueller, Vivienne Armbruester, Pedro Mestres, Klaus Roemer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Ashkenazi-Centric G334R Variant ofMolecular and cellular biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. p53 and mitochondrial function in neurons.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2014
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The mitochondrial p53 pathway.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2009
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristina HeyneInternal Medicine I, José-Carreras-Research Center, Bldg, 45,3, University of Saarland Medical School, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany. kristinaheyne@aol.com
Katrin Schmitt
Daniel Mueller
Vivienne Armbruester
Pedro Mestres
Klaus Roemer
Saarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMutation of a tumor suppressor allele leaves the second as backup. Not necessarily so with p53. This homo-tetrameric transcription factor can become contaminated with mutant p53 through hetero-tetramerization. In addition, it can be out-competed by the binding to p53 DNA recognition motifs of transactivation-incompetent isoforms (DeltaN and DeltaTA-isoforms) of the p53/p63/p73 family of proteins. Countermeasures against such dominant-negative or dominant-inhibitory action might include the evolutionary gain of novel, transactivation-independent tumor suppressor functions by the wild-type monomer.

resultsHere we have studied, mostly in human HCT116 colon adenocarcinoma cells with an intact p53 pathway, the effects of dominant-inhibitory p53 mutants and of Deltaex2/3p73, a tumor-associated DeltaTA-competitor of wild-type p53, on the nuclear transactivation-dependent and extra-nuclear transactivation-independent functions of wild-type p53. We report that mutant p53 and Deltaex2/3p73, expressed from a single gene copy per cell, interfere with the stress-induced expression of p53-responsive genes but leave the extra-nuclear apoptosis by mitochondrial p53 largely unaffected, although both wild-type and mutant p53 associate with the mitochondria. In accord with these observations, we present evidence that in contrast to nuclear p53 the vast majority of mitochondrial p53, be it wild-type or mutant, is consisting of monomeric protein.

conclusionThe extra-nuclear p53-dependent apoptosis may constitute a fail-safe mechanism against dominant inhibition.

Indexed as

ApoptosisAlpha-AmanitinAntineoplastic AgentsCell ProliferationColonic NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DNA-Binding ProteinsEtoposideFluorouracilGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, DominantHCT116 CellsHumansMitochondriaMutationNuclear ProteinsAlpha-AmanitinAntineoplastic AgentsCDKN1A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DNA-Binding ProteinsEtoposideFluorouracilNuclear ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTP73 protein, humanTumor Protein p73Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18547443
PMCPMC2440547
OpenAlexW2162976576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.