ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2008
Surgical outcomes of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of targeted drug therapy.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Prognosis Between Microscopically Positive and Negative Surgical Margins for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- Surgical outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a single unit experience in the era of targeted drug therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2012Trial
- Patient and Tumor Factors Influencing Diagnostic Trajectories in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients and Their Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Dutch Multicenter Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors-A Mini Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor as a Gateway forWorld journal of oncology · 2020Article
- Racial Disparity in Incidence and Survival for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): an Analysis of SEER Database.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2019Article
- Prognostic factors for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours: are they the same in the multidisciplinary treatment era?Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2014Article
- Clinical outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in southern Thailand.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2012Article
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumours treated before and after the advent of c-kit immunostaining.World journal of surgical oncology · 2011Article
- A hidden cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.BMJ case reports · 2011Article
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) recurrence following surgery: review of the clinical utility of imatinib treatment.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe discovery of the c-KIT mutation and the advent of targeted drug therapy with imatinib mesylate have revolutionized the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The outcome of patients with surgically treated GISTs treated in the era of targeted drug therapy was assessed and factors associated with adverse outcomes determined. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with GISTs requiring surgery at a tertiary care center from 2002 to 2007 were reviewed and prognostic factors determined.
resultsForty patients were surgically treated for GISTs. The median age at presentation was 59 years. The stomach (55%) was the main site of primary disease. The median tumor size was 7 cm. Eleven (28%) patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Surgery was undertaken in all patients with curative intent. Multi-organ resection was required in 10 (25%) patients. Imatinib mesylate was administered postoperatively in 68% of cases. Median follow-up was 24 months. There was a 40% recurrence rate with 63% undergoing repeat surgical resection. The peritoneum and liver were the main sites of recurrent disease. The 5-year disease-specific survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were 65% and 35%, respectively. High mitotic rate (P = 0.017) and tumor size greater than 10 cm (P = 0.009) were the only prognostically significant adverse factors of DFS on multivariate analysis, independent of imatinib mesylate treatment.
conclusionAggressive surgical treatment and follow-up of GISTs, combined with targeted drug therapy, leads to long-term DFS survival. Tumor recurrence is independently associated with a high tumor mitotic rate and size greater than 10 cm, despite the use of adjuvant targeted drug therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.