Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18546049›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2008

Surgical outcomes of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of targeted drug therapy.

Mehrdad Nikfarjam, Eric Kimchi, Serene Shereef, Niraj J Gusani, Yixing Jiang, John Liang, Mandeep Sehmbey, Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors-A Mini Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in southern Thailand.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehrdad NikfarjamDepartment of Surgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, H070, 500 University Drive, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USA. mnikfarjam@psu.edu
Eric Kimchi
Serene Shereef
Niraj J Gusani
Yixing Jiang
John Liang
Mandeep Sehmbey
Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe discovery of the c-KIT mutation and the advent of targeted drug therapy with imatinib mesylate have revolutionized the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The outcome of patients with surgically treated GISTs treated in the era of targeted drug therapy was assessed and factors associated with adverse outcomes determined. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with GISTs requiring surgery at a tertiary care center from 2002 to 2007 were reviewed and prognostic factors determined.

resultsForty patients were surgically treated for GISTs. The median age at presentation was 59 years. The stomach (55%) was the main site of primary disease. The median tumor size was 7 cm. Eleven (28%) patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Surgery was undertaken in all patients with curative intent. Multi-organ resection was required in 10 (25%) patients. Imatinib mesylate was administered postoperatively in 68% of cases. Median follow-up was 24 months. There was a 40% recurrence rate with 63% undergoing repeat surgical resection. The peritoneum and liver were the main sites of recurrent disease. The 5-year disease-specific survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were 65% and 35%, respectively. High mitotic rate (P = 0.017) and tumor size greater than 10 cm (P = 0.009) were the only prognostically significant adverse factors of DFS on multivariate analysis, independent of imatinib mesylate treatment.

conclusionAggressive surgical treatment and follow-up of GISTs, combined with targeted drug therapy, leads to long-term DFS survival. Tumor recurrence is independently associated with a high tumor mitotic rate and size greater than 10 cm, despite the use of adjuvant targeted drug therapy.

Indexed as

AgedBenzamidesChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylateImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedBenzamidesImatinib MesylatePiperazinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID18546049
OpenAlexW2052770603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.