Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18546030›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2008

Assessing response to osteoporosis therapy.

E M Lewiecki, N B Watts

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Relationship between baseline characteristics and response to risedronate treatment for osteoporosis: data from three Japanese phase III trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2010
    Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Operationalizing Treat-to-Target for Osteoporosis.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Review
  7. Investigation of Pyrophosphates KYPNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  8. Osteoporosis: Treat-to-Target.Current osteoporosis reports · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Factors associated with bisphosphonate treatment failure in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bone densitometry and vertebral fracture assessment.Current osteoporosis reports · 2010
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures among postmenopausal women and older men.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Review
  19. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists
    Article
  20. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E M LewieckiNew Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, 300 Oak St. NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA. LEWIECKI@aol.com
N B Watts

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients treated with pharmacological agents to improve bone strength and reduce fracture risk may not achieve optimal skeletal benefit for reasons that include poor compliance and persistence, inadequate calcium and vitamin D intake, malabsorption, and medications or co-morbidities with adverse skeletal effects. Monitoring the effects of therapy can inform the patient and physician that the drug is having its expected skeletal response. Treatment is often monitored with serial bone mineral density (BMD) measurements using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or bone turnover markers (BTMs). Stable or increasing BMD is associated with reduced fracture risk in clinical trials, and is considered an indication of good response to therapy in individual patients outside of clinical trials. There are many differences between subjects in clinical trials and patients being treated in clinical practice. Thus, although defining a clinical practice patient as a "nonresponder" or "suboptimal responder" to treatment is problematic, a pragmatic approach would be to consider evaluation for contributing factors and possible changes in therapy in patients who have a statistically significant decrease in BMD, do not have the expected change in BTMs, or have a fracture.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDrug MonitoringFractures, BoneHumansOsteoporosisPrescription DrugsTreatment OutcomeBone Density Conservation AgentsPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.