ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2008
Evaluation of trends in the cost of initial cancer treatment.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 188 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
188 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence and determinants of financial toxicity in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal for equity in health · 2026Pooled it
- Economic and Humanistic Burden of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Pooled it
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic indicator in gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- The global impact of non-communicable diseases on healthcare spending and national income: a systematic review.European journal of epidemiology · 2015Pooled it
- The costs of treating breast cancer in the US: a synthesis of published evidence.PharmacoEconomics · 2009Pooled it
- Medical oncologists' willingness to participate in bundled payment programs.BMC health services research · 2018Trial
- Hospital and geographic variability in two colorectal cancer surgery outcomes: complications and mortality after complications.Annals of surgical oncology · 2014Trial
- A randomized trial of tailoring and motivational interviewing to promote fruit and vegetable consumption for cancer prevention and control.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2009Trial
- Financial Distress Screening and Financial Navigation Among Adolescents and Young Adults Within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program: Results of the 2022 Landscape Survey.JCO oncology practice · 2026Article
- Cost of Breast Cancer Treatment by Comorbidity in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates: A Retrospective Data Analytical Approach.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
- Poverty and Mortality Risk in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Hospitalist Care for Unplanned Oncology Admissions: A Mixed-Method Analysis of Oncology and General Hospitalist Outcomes and Processes.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- County-level medical debt and treatment initiation among individuals newly diagnosed with cancer.Cancer · 2025Article
- Abscopal effects in patients with malignant melanoma treated with radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition: analysis of a large observational multicenter study.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Observational
- Disparities in inpatient treatment and expenditures among lung cancer patients under tiered social health insurance: a population-based study in China.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Trend and burden of adult cancer-related hospitalizations in the United States.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessing the Economic Impact of Cancer Care: A Study on Out-of-Pocket Expenditures and Utilization in South Korea.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Medical treatment cost for Chinese inpatients with colorectal cancer by sites.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- The Erosion of Healthcare and Scientific Integrity: A Growing Concern.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Review
128 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite reports of increases in the cost of cancer treatment, little is known about how costs of cancer treatment have changed over time and what services have contributed to the increases.
methodsWe used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database for 306,709 persons aged 65 and older and diagnosed with breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer between 1991 and 2002 to assess the number of patients assigned to initial cancer care, from 2 months before diagnosis to 12 months after diagnosis, and mean annual Medicare payments for this care according to cancer type and type of treatment. Mutually exclusive treatment categories were cancer-related surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and other hospitalizations during the period of initial cancer care. Linear regression models were used to assess temporal trends in the percentage of patients receiving treatment and costs for those treated. We extrapolated our results based on the SEER data to the US Medicare population to estimate national Medicare payments by cancer site and treatment category. All statistical tests were two-sided.
resultsFor patients diagnosed in 2002, Medicare paid an average of $39,891 for initial care for each lung cancer patient, $41 134 for each colorectal cancer patient, and $20,964 for each breast cancer patient, corresponding to inflation-adjusted increases from 1991 of $7139, $5345, and $4189, respectively. During the same interval, the mean Medicare payment for initial care for prostate cancer declined by $196 to $18261 in 2002. Costs for any hospitalization accounted for the largest portion of payments for all cancers. Chemotherapy use increased markedly for all cancers between 1991 and 2002, as did radiation therapy use (except for colorectal cancers). Total 2002 Medicare payments for initial care for these four cancers exceeded $6.7 billion, with colorectal and lung cancers being the most costly overall.
conclusionsThe statistically significant increase in costs of initial cancer treatment reflects more patients receiving surgery and adjuvant therapy and rising prices for these treatments. These trends are likely to continue in the near future, although more efficient targeting of costly therapies could mitigate the overall economic impact of this trend.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.