Trial reportJAMA2008
Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00100295 (Controlled Trial of an Herbal Treatment for Juvenile Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Controlled Trial of an Herbal Treatment for Juvenile Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized clinical trial.Translational psychiatry · 2022Trial
- The acute effect of Hypericum perforatum on short-term memory in healthy adults.Psychopharmacology · 2019Trial
- Huo-Luo-Xiao-Ling (HLXL)-Dan, a Traditional Chinese Medicine, for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a multi-site, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2015Trial
- East Asian traditional medicine for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a scoping review.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Medicinal Plants for Child Mental Health: Clinical Insights, Active Compounds, and Perspectives for Rational Use.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Potential Novel Therapies for Neurodevelopmental Diseases Targeting Oxidative Stress.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Review
- The effectiveness of functional training on impulsiveness of females with intellectual disability.Health psychology research · 2020Article
- Neuroprotective Effects of Quercetin in Pediatric Neurological Diseases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Non-pharmacologic management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a review.Translational pediatrics · 2020Review
- Rationale for Dietary Antioxidant Treatment of ADHD.Nutrients · 2018Review
- Natural Compounds for the Management of Parkinson's Disease and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.BioMed research international · 2018Review
- The Challenge of Reproducibility and Accuracy in Nutrition Research: Resources and Pitfalls.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Review
- Natural Product-Derived Treatments for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Safety, Efficacy, and Therapeutic Potential of Combination Therapy.Neural plasticity · 2016Review
- Psychiatric Disorders and Polyphenols: Can They Be Helpful in Therapy?Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2015Review
- Complementary and alternative therapies for pediatric attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a descriptive review.ISRN psychiatry · 2012Article
- Dietary and nutritional treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: current research support and recommendations for practitioners.Current psychiatry reports · 2011Review
- Herbal medicines in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): An updated systematic review of clinical trials.Avicenna journal of phytomedicineReview
- Abuse and Misuse of Selected Dietary Supplements Among Adolescents: a Look at Poison Center Data.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAGArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextStimulant medication can effectively treat 60% to 70% of youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Yet many parents seek alternative therapies, and Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) is 1 of the top 3 botanicals used.
objectiveTo determine the efficacy and safety of H. perforatum for the treatment of ADHD in children. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted between March 2005 and August 2006 at Bastyr University, Kenmore, Washington, among a volunteer sample of 54 children aged 6 to 17 years who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) criteria for ADHD by structured interview.
interventionAfter a placebo run-in phase of 1 week, participants were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg of H. perforatum standardized to 0.3% hypericin (n = 27) or a matched placebo (n = 27) 3 times daily for 8 weeks. Other medications for ADHD were not allowed during the trial.
main outcome measuresPerformance on the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (range, 0-54) and Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (range, 0-7), and adverse events.
resultsOne patient in the placebo group withdrew because of an adverse event. No significant difference was found in the change in ADHD Rating Scale-IV scores from baseline to week 8 between the treatment and placebo groups: inattentiveness improved 2.6 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.6 to -0.6 points) with H. perforatum vs 3.2 points (95% CI, -5.7 to -0.8 points) with placebo (P = .68) and hyperactivity improved 1.8 points (95% CI, -3.7 to 0.1 points) with H. perforatum vs 2.0 points (95% CI, -4.1 to 0.1 points) with placebo (P = .89). There was also no significant difference between the 2 groups in the percentage of participants who met criteria for improvement (score < or = 2) on the Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (H. perforatum, 44.4%; 95% CI, 25.5%-64.7% vs placebo, 51.9%; 95% CI, 31.9%-71.3%; P = .59). No difference between groups was found in the number of participants who experienced adverse effects during the study period (H. perforatum, 40.7%; 95% CI, 22.4%-61.2% vs placebo, 44.4%; 95% CI, 25.5%-64.7%; P = .78).
conclusionIn this study, use of H. perforatum for treatment of ADHD over the course of 8 weeks did not improve symptoms.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00100295.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.