Trial reportEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics
Influence of pregnancy on one-compartmental bio-metric blood loss calculations after cesarean section and gynaecological surgery.
Trial report in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of one-compartmental bio-metric blood loss calculations with transfused blood volume taken into account after aneurysmectomy.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2011Trial
- Safety of uneventful cesarean section in terms of hemorrhage.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- One-compartmental biometric blood loss calculation after cesarean section.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date there are no data in the literature on the procedure for the indirect measurement of blood loss during cesarean section, based on the post-operative drop in haemoglobin (Hb), which has been due to the lack of biometrically determined parameters for the calculation of blood volume in pregnant women. This study was therefore conducted to determine the applicability of the drop in Hb levels blood loss calculation during cesarean section, based on a model previously validated in non-pregnant women. We compared this procedure in 54 patients who underwent cesarean section and 12 non-pregnant patients subjected to gynaecological surgery. The coefficient of the regression slope for the blood volume collected during surgery and the calculated blood loss in pregnant (y=0.6286x+366) and non-pregnant patients (y=0.7605x+514) did not show any significant difference (t=1.1009, p>0.5, 95% confidence interval:-2.736, +2.473). Our study therefore demonstrated the applicability of the procedure for the indirect measurement of surgical blood loss both in pregnant and non-pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.