ArticleDer Nervenarzt2008
[Clinical teaching with simulated patients in psychiatry and psychotherapy. A controlled pilot study].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Training in iterative hypothesis testing as part of psychiatric education. A randomized study].Der Nervenarzt · 2012Trial
- From practice to lecture hall: Optimizing communication courses in medical education.GMS journal for medical education · 2025Article
- Where it all begins: Predicting initial therapeutic skills before clinical training in cognitive behavior therapy.PloS one · 2024Article
- E-Learning Is Not Inferior to On-Site Teaching in a Psychiatric Examination Course.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- [Effectively communicate active listening : Comparison of two concepts].Der Nervenarzt · 2017Article
- [The quality of university teaching in psychiatry and psychotherapy: results of a survey on the current status following the introduction of the new medical accreditation system].Der Nervenarzt · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because of the new medical licensure act in Germany, much more bedside teaching than before is needed. For many of the relevant clinical pictures, few patients can be expected to undergo study lessons. That is why many universities use simulated patients (SP). In contrast to other disciplines such as internal medicine or surgery, there is not much literature about SP in psychiatry and psychotherapy. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate if SP used for clinical teaching in addition to real patients are well accepted for simulation of psychiatric illnesses and clinical teaching. After randomization, one half of the 139 study medical students were taught using real patients and the other half using real patients and SP. The amounts of patient contact were equal in both groups. Using a questionnaire, pre- and postanalysis was carried out of answers about communication skills, the capability of addressing difficult subjects such as suicidality, and interest in psychiatry. The acceptance rate of SP was very high. Students' ratings of clinical teaching and their own performance, and their interest in future psychiatric work were significantly higher in the SP group. The results of this pilot study are very encouraging and indicate that the systematic use of SP in clinical psychiatric teaching is not only an appropriate alternative to real patients but also can lead to higher quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18542907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.