Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18541529›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2008

Role of dual specificity phosphatases in biological responses to glucocorticoids.

Andrew R Clark, Joana R S Martins, Carmen R Tchen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. mBio · 2023
    Article
  8. Molecular Signaling and Transcriptional Regulation of Histamine HCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. P38 MAPK and glucocorticoid receptor crosstalk in bronchial epithelial cells.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew R ClarkKennedy Institute of Rheumatology Division, Imperial College London, 1 Aspenlea Road, Hammersmith, London W6 8LH, United Kingdom. andy.clark@imperial.ac.uk
Joana R S Martins
Carmen R Tchen
Hammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The powerful anti-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids (GCs) have been known for more than sixty years, but their molecular mechanisms are still incompletely understood and hotly debated. The GC receptor (GR) was cloned in 1985 and shown to be a transcription factor. Initially, the anti-inflammatory actions of GCs were explained in terms of genes that were up-regulated by the receptor. However, none of these putative mediators seemed able to account for the spectrum of anti-inflammatory responses to GCs. The discovery of a negative regulatory function of GR then shifted the focus away from GC-induced genes as anti-inflammatory mediators. In recent years, attention has begun to move back toward the idea that the anti-inflammatory response to GCs is partially dependent on the positive regulation of gene expression by GR.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDual-Specificity PhosphatasesGlucocorticoidsHumansInflammationLigandsMiceModels, BiologicalReceptors, GlucocorticoidSignal TransductionTranscriptional ActivationAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDual-Specificity PhosphatasesGlucocorticoidsLigandsReceptors, Glucocorticoid

Identifiers

PMID18541529
PMCPMC3258850
OpenAlexW2006473625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.