ReviewDrugs & aging2008
Compliance with medication in nursing homes for older people: resident enforcement or resident empowerment?
Review in Drugs & aging, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medication administration in aged care facilities: A mixed-methods systematic review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Pooled it
- Medication refusal in residential aged care homes: A qualitative exploratory study.Nursing ethics · 2026Article
- Impact of nurse-led home visits on medication management and use of medical screenings for adults with intellectual disabilities: a randomised-controlled trial.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Community pharmacists' knowledge of, and role in, managing anticholinergic burden among patients with dementia in primary care: a cross-sectional survey study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Denosumab utilization among older adults in Ontario: patient characteristics, persistence with therapy, and return to therapy after an extended gap.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compliance with medication has been frequently cited as a problem for patients living in community settings. However, there has been little commentary on compliance issues for residents in nursing homes. This is probably due to the assumption that residents will receive their medication on a regular basis and administration will be supervised and, therefore, compliance is not perceived to be a problem. However, regular compliance may not always be appropriate if the medication has not been reviewed for appropriateness and this 'enforced' compliance may give rise to side effects or adverse effects. Residents may also be exposed to 'erratic' compliance because of inconvenient administration times for staff or difficult and time-consuming administration instructions. This may have clinical implications for residents who require medication at regular intervals, e.g. those who have Parkinson's disease. Enforced or erratic compliance is at odds with shared decision making, which is being promoted as a way of empowering patients. It could be argued that because of a high degree of cognitive impairment, it is not appropriate for nursing home residents to become involved in decision making about medications. However, the nursing home population is heterogeneous in nature and the assumption should not be made that all residents are incapable of becoming more involved in some aspects of their own care. A greater focus on resident-centred care may promote more empowerment and autonomy, both generally and with respect to compliance with medication in particular, in nursing home residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18540686What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.