Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18539610›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2008

Hierarchy of nonhomologous end-joining, single-strand annealing and gene conversion at site-directed DNA double-strand breaks.

Wael Y Mansour, Sabine Schumacher, Raphael Rosskopf, Tim Rhein, Filip Schmidt-Petersen, Fruszina Gatzemeier, Friedrich Haag, Kerstin Borgmann, Henning Willers, Jochen Dahm-Daphi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The cancer-testis gene,Cancer biology & medicine · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wael Y MansourLaboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical School Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Sabine Schumacher
Raphael Rosskopf
Tim Rhein
Filip Schmidt-Petersen
Fruszina Gatzemeier
Friedrich Haag
Kerstin Borgmann
Henning Willers
Jochen Dahm-Daphi
Harvard University · USUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammalian cells, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by three pathways, nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), gene conversion (GC) and single-strand annealing (SSA). These pathways are distinct with regard to repair efficiency and mutagenic potential and must be tightly controlled to preserve viability and genomic stability. Here, we employed chromosomal reporter constructs to characterize the hierarchy of NHEJ, GC and SSA at a single I-SceI-induced DSB in Chinese hamster ovary cells. We discovered that the use of GC and SSA was increased by 6- to 8-fold upon loss of Ku80 function, suggesting that NHEJ is dominant over the other two pathways. However, NHEJ efficiency was not altered if GC was impaired by Rad51 knockdown. Interestingly, when SSA was made available as an alternative mode for DSB repair, loss of Rad51 function led to an increase in SSA activity at the expense of NHEJ, implying that Rad51 may indirectly promote NHEJ by limiting SSA. We conclude that a repair hierarchy exists to limit the access of the most mutagenic mechanism, SSA, to the break site. Furthermore, the cellular choice of repair pathways is reversible and can be influenced at the level of effector proteins such as Ku80 or Rad51.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairGene ConversionRecombination, GeneticAnimalsAntigens, NuclearCell LineCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedGenes, ReporterKu AutoantigenModels, BiologicalRad51 RecombinaseAntigens, NuclearDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedKu AutoantigenRad51 Recombinase

Identifiers

PMID18539610
PMCPMC2475611
OpenAlexW2163062435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.