Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18539423›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis2008

The development of multiple probe microdialysis sampling in the stomach.

Kristin L Woo, Craig E Lunte

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristin L WooR.N. Adams Institute for Bioanalytical Chemistry, University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA.
Craig E Lunte
University of Kansas · US

Funding

IN VIVO INVESTIGATIONS USING MICRODIALYSIS SAMPLINGR01EB000247 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI LUNTE, CRAIG E · 2002 to 2010
$2.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000247NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB00247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multiple probe approach of implanting microdialysis probes into each separate tissue layer would better represent sampling from the stomach. Presently, microdialysis sampling experiments are performed with only a single probe in the submucosa to represent sampling from the stomach tissue. The focus of this research was to develop a four-probe microdialysis sampling design to simultaneously monitor the stomach lumen, mucosa, submucosa and in the blood of the rat. Due to the small outer diameter of the microdialysis probe (350 microm), implantation into each separate layer was achieved with confirmation of probe location from histological examination. To assess the significance of sampling by this approach, multiple probe microdialysis sampling was used to monitor drug absorption in the stomach. Salicylic acid, caffeine and metoprolol were individually dosed to the ligated stomach. Analysis of the dialysate samples was performed by HPLC-UV and concentration-time curves and pharmacokinetics analysis were used to determine differences between the different probe locations.

Indexed as

AbsorptionAnimalsArea Under CurveCaffeineFemaleGastric MucosaJugular VeinsMetabolic Clearance RateMetoprololMicrodialysisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySalicylic AcidStomachCaffeineMetoprololSalicylic Acid

Identifiers

PMID18539423
PMCPMC2575025
OpenAlexW1966126853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.