ArticleCellular signalling2008
KIT associated intracellular tyrosines play an essential role in EpoR co-signaling.
Article in Cellular signalling, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Kit transduced signals counteract erythroid maturation by MAPK-dependent modulation of erythropoietin signaling and apoptosis induction in mouse fetal liver.Cell death and differentiation · 2015Article
- Role of stem cell factor in the reactivation of human fetal hemoglobin.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
KIT and erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) mediated co-signaling is essential for normal erythroid cell expansion, however the intracellular signals that contribute to cooperative signaling are poorly understood. Here, we examined the role of intracellular tyrosine residues in KIT and EpoR cooperation by co-expressing tyrosine (Y) to phenylalanine (F) and deletion mutants of KIT and EpoR in 32D cells. Of the four EpoR mutants examined, only EpoR-Y343 induced proliferation to near wildtype EpoR levels. A modest increase in the growth was also observed in 32D cells expressing the EpoR-Y343F; however neither EpoR-W282R nor EpoR-F8 showed any increase in growth over baseline. Biochemical analysis revealed that EpoR-Y343 induced the activation of Stat5, PI-3Kinase/Akt and MAP kinase Erk1/2 to near wildtype EpoR levels, while the remaining mutants failed to activate any of these signals. Interestingly, none of the EpoR mutants cooperated with WT KIT, although EpoR-Y343 showed a modest increase in co-signaling. Loss of seven tyrosine residues in KIT (KIT-F7) completely abrogated EpoR induced co-signaling. Restoring the Src kinase binding sites in KIT-F7 alone or together with the PI3Kinase binding site restored KIT induced signals as well as co-signals with WT EpoR, although restoring the Src kinase binding sites along with the PLC-gamma binding site repressed both KIT induced signaling as well as co-signaling with WT EpoR. Taken together, these results suggest that KIT and EpoR mediated co-signaling requires intracellular tyrosine residues and tyrosine residues that bind Src kinases in the KIT receptor appear to be sufficient for restoring both KIT signaling as well as co-signaling with EpoR. In contrast, restoration of the PLC-gamma binding site in the context of Src binding sites appears to antagonize the positive signals induced via the Src kinase binding sites in the KIT receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.