Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18537484›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2008

Medical pluralism among American women: results of a national survey.

Christine Wade, Maria Chao, Fredi Kronenberg, Linda Cushman, Debra Kalmuss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Tai Chi and Workplace Wellness for Health Care Workers: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Phytoestrogens for menopausal vasomotor symptoms.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine WadeRichard & Hinda Rosenthal Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. wade@columbia.edu
Maria Chao
Fredi Kronenberg
Linda Cushman
Debra Kalmuss

Funding

WOMEN'S ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE USE--MULTIETHNIC SURVEYR01HD037073 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KRONENBERG, FREDI · 2000 to 2001
$1.4M
CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE IN WOMENS HEALTHU24HD033199 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KRONENBERG, FREDI · 1995 to 1999
–
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037073NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD 37073NICHD NIH HHS U24 HD33199-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical pluralism can be defined as the employment of more than one medical system or the use of both conventional and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for health and illness. American women use a variety of health services and practices for women's health conditions, yet no national study has specifically characterized women's medical pluralism. Our objective was to describe medical pluralism among American women.

methodsA nationally representative telephone survey of 808 women >or=18 years of age was conducted in 2001. Cross-sectional observations of the use of 11 CAM domains and the use of an additional domain--spirituality, religion, or prayer for health--during the past year are reported. Women's health conditions, treatments used, reasons for use, and disclosure to conventional physicians are described, along with predictors of CAM use.

resultsOver half (53%) of respondents used CAM for health conditions, especially for those involving chronic pain. The majority of women disclosed such practices at clinical encounters with conventional providers. Biologically based CAM therapies, such as nutritional supplements and herbs, were commonly used with prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) pharmaceuticals for health conditions.

conclusionsMedical pluralism is common among women and should be accepted as a cultural norm. Although disclosure rates of CAM use to conventional providers were higher than in previous population-based studies, disclosure should be increased, especially for women who are pregnant and those with heart disease and cancer. The health risks and benefits of polypharmacy should be addressed at multiple levels of the public health system.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorLife StyleWomen's HealthAdultAgedAttitude to HealthComplementary TherapiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicPrevalenceSelf CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18537484
PMCPMC2942786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.