Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18536953›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2009

Randomized, active-controlled study of once-weekly alendronate 280 mg high dose oral buffered solution for treatment of Paget's disease.

M Hooper, A Faustino, I R Reid, D Hosking, N L Gilchrist, P Selby, M Wu, G Salzmann, J West, A Leung

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00480662 (A 6-Month, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Alendronate 280-mg Oral Buffered Solution Once Weekly in Patients With Paget's Disease of Bone), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00480662 phase3completednot on this map

A 6-Month, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Alendronate 280-mg Oral Buffered Solution Once Weekly in Patients With Paget's Disease of Bone

TypeinterventionalSponsorOrganon and CoRan2001 to 2002Enrolled60ConditionsPaget's Disease of BoneArmsalendronate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Bisphosphonates for Paget's disease of bone in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Paget's Disease of Bone: A Review of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Management.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2009
    Article
  5. Current options for the treatment of Paget's disease of the bone.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M HooperUniversity of Sydney, 56 St Johns Ave, Gordon, NSW, 2072, Australia. mjhooper@bigpond.net.au
A Faustino
I R Reid
D Hosking
N L Gilchrist
P Selby
M Wu
G Salzmann
J West
A Leung

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledDaily oral tablet bisphosphonate therapy for Paget's disease of bone may cause serious upper gastrointestinal adverse events. A once-weekly alendronate 280 mg oral buffered solution was compared with an alendronate 40 mg/day tablet. While both were similarly effective, the tablet appeared to be better tolerated in this study.

introductionAlthough daily doses of oral bisphosphonates are a generally safe and effective treatment for Paget's disease of bone (PDB), some patients may experience upper gastrointestinal adverse events (UGI AEs) or find the dosing requirements inconvenient and become noncompliant. A once-weekly (OW) oral dose of bisphosphonate in buffered solution (OBS) may be as effective, better tolerated, and more convenient.

methodsSixty-three patients were randomized to either alendronate (ALN) 280 mg OW OBS (n = 42) or an ALN 40 mg/day tablet (n = 21) during a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial. The primary endpoint was the mean percent decrease in total serum alkaline phosphatase (total ALP) from baseline at 6 months.

resultsThere were no significant differences in total ALP between groups during the 6-month period. There was a higher incidence of clinical AEs in the ALN 280 mg OW OBS (79%) vs. the ALN 40 mg/day tablet group (67%), including drug related AEs (48% and 10%, respectively), which led to study discontinuation (19.0% and 10%, respectively).

conclusionsAlthough ALN 280 mg OW OBS was similarly effective as ALN 40 mg/day in reducing total ALP in patients with PDB, the ALN 40 mg/day tablet appears to be better tolerated than ALN 280 mg OW OBS.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAlendronateAnalysis of VarianceBone Density Conservation AgentsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMiddle AgedOsteitis DeformansSolutionsTabletsAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsSolutionsTablets

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.