Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18536564›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in hematology2008

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization: new regimens, new cells, where do we stand.

Louis M Pelus

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in hematology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical significance of serum expression of GROβ in hepatocellular carcinoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louis M PelusDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Walther Oncology Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. lpelus@iupui.edu
Indiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Role of PGE2 and other eicosanoids in hematopoietic stem cell functionR01HL096305 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI PELUS, LOUIS M · 2010 to 2018
$3.5M
Chemokine Induced Hematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationR01HL069669 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI PELUS, LOUIS M · 2001 to 2009
$2.8M
Role of Survivin in Blood Stem Cell Cycle and ApoptosisR01HL079654 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI PELUS, LOUIS M · 2004 to 2007
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL079654NHLBI NIH HHS HL69669NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL069669NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL079654NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells are widely used to reconstitute hematopoiesis; however, preclinical and clinical studies show that improvements to this mobilization can be achieved. We discuss the development of new mobilizing regimens and evaluation of new findings on mobilized stem cell populations that may improve the utility and convenience of peripheral blood stem cell transplant. RECENT

findingsChemokines and their receptors regulate leukocyte trafficking, and altering chemokine signaling pathways mobilizes stem cells. In recent trials, combination use of the chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 antagonist AMD3100 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized more CD34 cells in fewer days than granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone and allowed more patients to proceed to autotransplant. In preclinical studies the chemokine GRObeta synergizes with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and when used alone or with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilizes more primitive hematopoietic stem cells with less apoptosis, higher integrin activation, lower CD26 expression and enhanced marrow homing compared with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Hematopoietic stem cells mobilized by GRObeta or AMD3100 demonstrate superior engraftment and contribution to chimerism in primary and secondary transplant studies in mice, and peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by AMD3100 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients demonstrate enhanced engraftment capabilities in immunodeficient mice. SUMMARY: Alternate regimens differentially mobilize stem cell populations with unique intrinsic properties with the potential to expand the utility of hematopoietic transplantation. Continued mechanistic evaluation will be critical to our understanding of mechanisms of mobilization and their use in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

AnimalsChemokines, CXCHematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationHumansPeripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationReceptors, CXCRChemokines, CXCReceptors, CXCR

Identifiers

PMID18536564
PMCPMC2806229
OpenAlexW2118606249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.